Lewis Silkin advised Oxfam against naming staff accused of sexual exploitation, report reveals
Details of firm's advice on sexual abuse allegations revealed in International Development committee report
July 31, 2018 at 09:01 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Lewis Silkin advised Oxfam against naming staff that allegedly engaged in sexual misconduct while working for the charity in Haiti, according to a letter published in the International Development Committee's report on sexual exploitation in the aid sector.
The charity sought advice from the law firm in August 2011, following allegations of misconduct by its staff in Haiti after the earthquake that hit the country in 2010.
According to the report, which was published in full today (31 July), the employment specialist firm told Oxfam that it "would not be prudent" to name of any of the employees involved – or the types of misconduct being investigated – to either donors or external bodies as it would "open us to charges of defamation of character" by the accused staff.
In attached extracts of Lewis Silkin's advice, the charity was told: "If you decide that you want to publicise the precise allegations, you should be aware that all of those who have been dismissed/left are likely to be tarred with the same brush in terms of the nature of allegations – this could potentially lead to a defamation claim against us."
Oxfam was also warned of a potential "press war" in which "the employee might make potentially damaging (whether true or untrue) statements about Oxfam".
According to a letter from former Oxfam chief executive Dame Barbara Stocking to the International Develoment Committee, the charity took legal advice on whether prostitution was or was not illegal in Haiti, and was told that it was not. Stocking added that "even if the use of prostitutes had been a criminal offence, it is unclear that there would have been a legal requirement for Oxfam to report this to the local authorities".
This followed a "detailed investigation" into whether minors had been exploited by Oxfam staff, which concluded that minors were not involved.
According to Stocking, the charity was told that the "use of prostitutes is still only illegal in a handful of countries in the world", meaning "there was no evidence [...] that crimes had been committed by any of the Oxfam staff".
Oxfam was not the only charity to take advice from Lewis Silkin with regards to allegations of inappropriate behaviour by members of its staff.
In May, Legal Week revealed that Save the Children opted not to reopen a disciplinary investigation into allegations of inappropriate behaviour by former chief executive Justin Forsyth, on the basis of advice from Lewis Silkin, which was supported by Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer.
According to the charity's former chair Sir Alan Parker, Save the Children was advised by Lewis Silkin that there would be "no good reason" to reopen an investigation into Forsyth after issues were raised by complainants about the handling of their reports, as there had been "no new allegations". Freshfields "agreed" with Lewis Silkin's advice and the charity's trustees unanimously chose not to reopen the investigation.
Lewis Silkin declined to comment.
Photo credit: RIBI Image Library
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGoodwin to Launch Brussels Office With Quinn Emanuel Antitrust Partner
3 minute readDespite Brexit, UK Lawyers Still Dominate on Big EU Antitrust Lawsuits
7 minute readHow to Litigate Before the EU’s Top Court, the European Court of Justice
5 minute readSemiconductor Component Maker Accused of Deceiving Investors About Market Downturn, Export Curbs
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'If the Job Is Better, You Get Better': Chief District Judge Discusses Overcoming Negative Perceptions During Q&A
- 2Nondisparagement Clauses in Divorce: Balancing Family Harmony and Free Speech
- 3Survey Finds Majority of Legal Professionals Still Intimidated by AI Despite Need to Streamline Mounting Caseloads
- 4Lessons From Five Popular Change Management Concepts: A Guide for Law Firm Leaders in 2025
- 5People in the News—Jan. 15, 2025—Ballard Spahr, Brahin Law
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250