Lewis Silkin advised Oxfam against naming staff accused of sexual exploitation, report reveals
Details of firm's advice on sexual abuse allegations revealed in International Development committee report
July 31, 2018 at 09:01 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Lewis Silkin advised Oxfam against naming staff that allegedly engaged in sexual misconduct while working for the charity in Haiti, according to a letter published in the International Development Committee's report on sexual exploitation in the aid sector.
The charity sought advice from the law firm in August 2011, following allegations of misconduct by its staff in Haiti after the earthquake that hit the country in 2010.
According to the report, which was published in full today (31 July), the employment specialist firm told Oxfam that it "would not be prudent" to name of any of the employees involved – or the types of misconduct being investigated – to either donors or external bodies as it would "open us to charges of defamation of character" by the accused staff.
In attached extracts of Lewis Silkin's advice, the charity was told: "If you decide that you want to publicise the precise allegations, you should be aware that all of those who have been dismissed/left are likely to be tarred with the same brush in terms of the nature of allegations – this could potentially lead to a defamation claim against us."
Oxfam was also warned of a potential "press war" in which "the employee might make potentially damaging (whether true or untrue) statements about Oxfam".
According to a letter from former Oxfam chief executive Dame Barbara Stocking to the International Develoment Committee, the charity took legal advice on whether prostitution was or was not illegal in Haiti, and was told that it was not. Stocking added that "even if the use of prostitutes had been a criminal offence, it is unclear that there would have been a legal requirement for Oxfam to report this to the local authorities".
This followed a "detailed investigation" into whether minors had been exploited by Oxfam staff, which concluded that minors were not involved.
According to Stocking, the charity was told that the "use of prostitutes is still only illegal in a handful of countries in the world", meaning "there was no evidence [...] that crimes had been committed by any of the Oxfam staff".
Oxfam was not the only charity to take advice from Lewis Silkin with regards to allegations of inappropriate behaviour by members of its staff.
In May, Legal Week revealed that Save the Children opted not to reopen a disciplinary investigation into allegations of inappropriate behaviour by former chief executive Justin Forsyth, on the basis of advice from Lewis Silkin, which was supported by Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer.
According to the charity's former chair Sir Alan Parker, Save the Children was advised by Lewis Silkin that there would be "no good reason" to reopen an investigation into Forsyth after issues were raised by complainants about the handling of their reports, as there had been "no new allegations". Freshfields "agreed" with Lewis Silkin's advice and the charity's trustees unanimously chose not to reopen the investigation.
Lewis Silkin declined to comment.
Photo credit: RIBI Image Library
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClifford Chance Under Fire for Human Rights Assessment of Saudi Arabia World Cup Bid
5 minute readThe Week in Data Nov. 7: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Trump Win Ignites Global Legal Market: Lawyers Prepare for High Demand & Uncertainty
Netflix Offices Raided by Authorities in Paris and Amsterdam
Trending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250