What to Know When Building Artificial Intelligence in the Law Firm
An excerpt of ALM Intelligence's recent report on why law firms need artificial intelligence to remain competitive and relevant.
August 02, 2018 at 01:38 PM
3 minute read
Below is an excerpt of Law Firms Need Artificial Intelligence to Stay in the Game. The full report is available on the ALM Intelligence website. Artificial Intelligence Building Blocks Data: Processes: Talent: Human + Machine: Reimagining Work in the Age of AI
- Trainers: Teaches AI systems how to perform and AI algorithms how to mimic human behavior.
- Explainers: Fills the gap between the business and technical sides of the organization.
- Sustainers: Makes sure the AI system is performing as planned and designed.
- How will AI impact the development of associates?
- How can AI be used to capture expertise?
- Will traditional staffing strategies change?
- Can the firm take on more complex cases as a result of AI?
- What impact does AI have on succession planning?
Culture: Technology:
- Integration considerations include assessing what the AI product can be integrated with and is compatible with, such as Android and Apple products, laptop/desktop versus mobile devices, Salesforce.com and Adobe Sign. To perform this exercise, a complete list of products, systems, and tools is required and needs to be cross-referenced against the AI functionality to see if there are any gaps. The AI landscape is quickly evolving, but still very much in the growing stage, which means not every product is 100% compatible with standard systems, solutions, and tools for law firms.
- Cloud is now the primary deployment method of AI. Cloud deployment makes installation and access to AI products simple, but has historically raised the level of discomfort for many firms. The cloud also comes with its own set of options – private, public or hybrid; and host options (e.g., AWS). While law firms should already have policies in place that pertain to using the cloud, they may not be formalized or recently updated. It's important that all of this is reviewed and updated frequently.
- Security, especially when considering cloud products, is front and center as a topic and major concern for law firm leaders. While the cloud does provide great security features and coverage, such as security updates included with AWS and Azure, and well-oiled policies, procedures and processes for handling, storing and using data based on type and location (among other factors), there are details to take into account. Clearly defining both procedurally and system access-wise who has what level of access to the AI system and the data will lay the foundation for AI security in the law firm.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
The Week in Data Dec. 13: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Trending Stories
- 1Recent Decisions Regarding the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- 2The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 3Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 4For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 5As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250