What to Know When Building Artificial Intelligence in the Law Firm
An excerpt of ALM Intelligence's recent report on why law firms need artificial intelligence to remain competitive and relevant.
August 02, 2018 at 01:38 PM
3 minute read
- Trainers: Teaches AI systems how to perform and AI algorithms how to mimic human behavior.
- Explainers: Fills the gap between the business and technical sides of the organization.
- Sustainers: Makes sure the AI system is performing as planned and designed.
- How will AI impact the development of associates?
- How can AI be used to capture expertise?
- Will traditional staffing strategies change?
- Can the firm take on more complex cases as a result of AI?
- What impact does AI have on succession planning?
- Integration considerations include assessing what the AI product can be integrated with and is compatible with, such as Android and Apple products, laptop/desktop versus mobile devices, Salesforce.com and Adobe Sign. To perform this exercise, a complete list of products, systems, and tools is required and needs to be cross-referenced against the AI functionality to see if there are any gaps. The AI landscape is quickly evolving, but still very much in the growing stage, which means not every product is 100% compatible with standard systems, solutions, and tools for law firms.
- Cloud is now the primary deployment method of AI. Cloud deployment makes installation and access to AI products simple, but has historically raised the level of discomfort for many firms. The cloud also comes with its own set of options – private, public or hybrid; and host options (e.g., AWS). While law firms should already have policies in place that pertain to using the cloud, they may not be formalized or recently updated. It's important that all of this is reviewed and updated frequently.
- Security, especially when considering cloud products, is front and center as a topic and major concern for law firm leaders. While the cloud does provide great security features and coverage, such as security updates included with AWS and Azure, and well-oiled policies, procedures and processes for handling, storing and using data based on type and location (among other factors), there are details to take into account. Clearly defining both procedurally and system access-wise who has what level of access to the AI system and the data will lay the foundation for AI security in the law firm.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMeta’s New Content Guidelines May Result in Increased Defamation Lawsuits Among Users
Portuguese Law Firm Launches Tech Arm, Becoming Multidisciplinary Operation
Are Firms and In-House Teams Courting Technological Debt With Ambitious Purchases?
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1An Eye on ‘De-Risking’: Chewing on Hot Topics in Litigation Funding With Jeffery Lula of GLS Capital
- 2Arguing Class Actions: With Friends Like These...
- 3How Some Elite Law Firms Are Growing Equity Partner Ranks Faster Than Others
- 4Fried Frank Partner Leaves for Paul Hastings to Start Tech Transactions Practice
- 5Stradley Ronon Welcomes Insurance Team From Mintz
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250