First-Year Enrollment Soars by Double Digits at Some Law Schools
An 8 percent increase in applicants nationwide has yielded significantly larger incoming classes at some, but not all, schools this fall as early numbers trickle in.
August 21, 2018 at 01:09 PM
4 minute read
Fledgling law students began arriving on campuses this month, and some law schools are welcoming a record number of new faces.
First-year enrollment is up 35 percent from last year at Arizona State University Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law. The University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law's new class is 25 percent bigger than its predecessor, and at 196 is its largest in six years.
Cleveland-Marshall College of Law saw a 30 percent climb in first-year J.D. enrollment, while the University of South Dakota School of Law and Elon University School of Law saw increases of 22 percent and 8 percent, respectively.
Many schools, including higher-ranked institutions, have yet to announce the size of their new classes, and official figures from the American Bar Association likely won't be available for three or four months. But experts predicted that enrollment would be up at many campuses this fall because the pool of people applying to law school for admission this fall grew by 8 percent over the previous year. Pundits have speculated that an improved entry-level legal job market and political upheaval have prompted more people to pursue careers in the law.
➤➤ Want more reporting on trends in legal education? Sign up here for Ahead of the Curve by Karen Sloan, a new email briefing from Law.com. Each week, Karen examines the transformation of legal education, spotlights innovative programs and breaks down the latest law school news.
First-year enrollment isn't up across the board, however. Brooklyn Law School held steady with its new J.D. class, while the nearby St. John's University welcomed a slightly smaller class of 251. However, that smaller class is especially diverse, the school noted. Thirty are first-generation Americans, 24 were born outside of the United States, and 27 percent are students of color.
“You are cancer survivors and environmental activists, dancers and athletes, teachers and technologists,” Dean Michael Simons said at a new student convocation Aug. 12. “You have worked with refugees and sexual assault victims. You have started businesses and raised children.”
Deans at several of the law schools that saw significant enrollment climbs also highlighted the higher academic credentials those classes brought in.
Arizona State's applicant pool was 64 percent larger than it was for the fall 2017 entering class, and that larger pool enabled the school to admit a new class with a median LSAT score of 163—up one point from the previous year.
“We have the faculty, resources and dedication to offer a world-class legal education, that's borne out by the incredible accomplishments of our graduates,” said Dean Douglas Sylvester. “Those results are attracting an increasingly talented pool of applicants from throughout the country, which allows us to keep aiming higher.”
McGeorge's median and 75th percentile LSAT scores are both up this year, as is the median undergraduate grade-point average of the new students. The increased size and quality of the new class were the result of a strategic plan put together by the law faculty and university, according to Dean Michael Hunter Schwartz.
“We set out to create a relevant, modern, practical, and innovative curriculum that would be attractive to prospective students, and we succeeded beyond our wildest expectations,” he said.
In addition to being larger, this year's national law school applicant pool performed better on the LSAT. Data from the Law School Admission Council shows that much of the growth came from applicants with LSAT scores of 160 and above—reversing the trend in which more people with lower LSAT scores were applying.
For more about increases in law school applications and higher LSAT scores among applicants, click here.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSolana Labs Co-Founder Allegedly Pocketed Ex-Wife’s ‘Millions of Dollars’ of Crypto Gains
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1On the Move and After Hours: Goldberg Segalla, Faegre Drinker, Pashman Stein
- 2Recent FTC Cases Against Auto Dealers Suggest Regulators Are Keeping Foot on Accelerator
- 3‘Not A Kindergarten Teacher’: Judge Blasts Keller Postman, Jenner & Block, in Mass Arb Dispute
- 4A&O Shearman, Hogan Lovells and the Stories That Shaped Africa This Year
- 5Borden Ladner Gervais Cyber Expert Warns of AI-Boosted Ransomware Attacks
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250