Legal Ops Down Under: CLOC Institute Heading to Australia
Las Vegas, London and now Sydney--CLOC leaders told Corporate Counsel why they decided to bring their latest gathering for in-house counsel and legal ops professionals to Australia.
August 21, 2018 at 01:13 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
The Corporate Legal Operations Consortium, one the leading organizations for in-house ops learning and collaboration, is bound for Australia.
On September 3 and 4, the group will hold its first institute in Asia Pacific, bringing ops professionals from Australia, Singapore, Hong Kong, Japan and elsewhere in the region together in Sydney to share strategies and network.
It's no coincidence that CLOC has chosen to expand its institutes, which have became well known in the U.S. and Europe, to Australia. The event comes at a time of legal ops growth down under.
“Australia has been one of the early adopters of legal operations globally,” said Connie Brenton, CLOC chief executive officer and chief of staff. “The regional CLOC organization has been in existence for almost two years as well.”
Brenton, who is senior director of legal operations at NetApp, said CLOC Australia's leader Mick Sheehy reached out to her a few years ago, as the general counsel of Telstra, seeking to collaborate with legal ops leaders worldwide. Since then, he and U.S.-based CLOC leaders have worked together to grow a community in Australia.
“[Sheehy] pulled together a very strong group of general counsel to start collaborating on what legal operations is and how could each of them could learn from one another so they weren't reinventing the wheel,” Brenton said.
Australia's legal operations community isn't identical to its American counterpart. CLOC was founded in the U.S., and has a larger, more established presence there. Both regions, however, are experiencing growth in legal ops.
There are also differences in Australian legal departments overall, which affect what the operations function looks like, CLOC leaders said.
According to Jeff Franke, Yahoo Inc. chief of staff and assistant general counsel, legal operations, and CLOC leadership team member, there tends to be less litigation for companies in Australia than in the U.S., so controlling outside counsel spend is somewhat less of a focus.
“It's also a very different marketplace,” Franke said. “You probably have about 20 percent of the market encompassing large legal departments, and 70 to 80 percent small legal departments, 50 people or less.”
Smaller legal departments often mean in-house lawyers playing multiple roles. Franke said it's not uncommon in Australia for GCs to hold the legal ops job too.
About five to seven years ago, he said American legal departments also often assigned legal ops roles to lawyers already at the company, versus dedicating an entire hire to the position.
There's also a heightened focus on technology use in Australia, compared to legal departments in the U.S. and elsewhere, with APAC often being ahead of the tech curve, according to Brenton.
CLOC's American leaders — four of whom will attend the Australian institute — said the content at September's institute will take into account the unique needs of legal ops leaders in the region, making it a bit different from what attendees have experienced at other regions' conferences.
But, of course, there will also be plenty that's applicable worldwide–as no matter what hemisphere a legal department is in, there are pain points in common.
“Australia is no different than the rest of the world in needing to address cost pressures associated with both internal costs, as well as external costs” Franke said. “Those pressures are driving them to make changes. There's also a fundamental interest in innovation.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMore Big Law Firms Rush to Match Associate Bonuses, While Some Offer Potential for Even More
Dog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
4 minute readIn Talc Bankruptcy, Andy Birchfield Skipped His Deposition. Could He Face Sanctions?
6 minute readGC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1First California Zantac Jury Ends in Mistrial
- 2Democrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal with GOP
- 3Trump Taps Former Fla. Attorney General for AG
- 4Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 5Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250