Denver Law Joins the Hybrid J.D. Trend
The American Bar Association's recent decision to double the number of credits J.D. students can take online may prompt additional law schools to transform their traditional part-time programs into largely online hybrids.
August 22, 2018 at 01:05 PM
4 minute read
More law schools are transforming their part-time programs to hybrid formats, with the University of Denver Sturm College of Law as the latest to go that route.
The school this month launched its new hybrid professional part-time J.D. program, which combines online and in-person coursework, with 35 students.
Students will come to campus eight weekends each semester for live instruction, with online classes offered in between. The hybrid program replaces the school's traditional part-time program, where students attend classes on campus. The change is designed to make the program more accessible to working professionals and those with family commitments, according to the school.
“The University of Denver Sturm College of Law has offered a nationally acclaimed part-time JD program for more than 100 years,” said dean Bruce Smith. “Our goal was to make this historic and mission-driven program even more accessible, affordable, and attentive to work-life balance—while, at the same time, preserving its exceptional quality and rigor.”
While some schools have shut down their part-time programs in recent years as J.D. enrollment overall has waned, others have replaced traditional and evening part-time programs with hybrids, as online education gains credibility.
Loyola University Chicago School of Law announced in 2015 that it was ending its night program and replacing it with a weekend program that combines in-person and online instruction. Seton Hall University School of Law followed suit the following year. And Touro College Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center also launched a hybrid weekend J.D. program this fall. (Western Michigan University Cooley Law School and Mitchell Hamline School of Law have each has weekend part-time programs for more than a decade.)
➤➤ Stay on top of developments and trends in legal education with Ahead of the Curve by Karen Sloan, a new weekly briefing from Law.com. Sign up here and get next week's email update straight to your inbox.
Still other schools have received variances from the American Bar Association to exceed its limits on J.D. credits earned through online courses, including Mitchell Hamline, Syracuse University College of Law, Southwestern Law School and the University of Dayton School of Law. Regent University School of Law has also requested a variance, though the ABA has yet to announce a decision.
It remains to be seen whether newly adopted rules allowing more online credits will speed the movement toward hybrid programs. The ABA this month increased the allowable number of online credits from 15 to as many as 30 and dropped its prohibition on online courses during the 1L year. (The new rule stipulates that up to a third of credits may be taken online, which will range from 28 to 30 at most law schools.) That change will enable hybrid programs that don't rely on ABA variances to shift more coursework online.
The online classes in Denver's new hybrid are asynchronous, meaning students may complete them on their own schedule. The program typically takes four years to complete, and the total cost of the degree is comparable to the cost of the traditional three-year J.D. program.
The program drew students from a wide variety of professional backgrounds, including education, compliance, engineering, sports management and molecular biology. Among them is Salt Lake City resident Jonathan Clark, who is vice president of workplace planning and advice at Fidelity Investments.
“I always liked the idea of earning a J.D. but didn't think that as a working executive that was possible,” he said. “When I heard about the format, I was excited because it allows me to continue to progress through my career, while at the same time go to law school.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Not A Kindergarten Teacher’: Judge Blasts Keller Postman, Jenner & Block, in Mass Arb Dispute
6 minute readSolana Labs Co-Founder Allegedly Pocketed Ex-Wife’s ‘Millions of Dollars’ of Crypto Gains
4 minute readInsurer Not Required to Cover $29M Wrongful Death Judgment, Appeals Court Rules
Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Trending Stories
- 1Zuckerman Spaeder Gets Ready to Move Offices in DC, Deploy AI Tools in 2025
- 2Pardoning Jan. 6 Defendants May Send Bad Message About Insurrection, Rule of Law
- 3Looming Clash Over Abortion Pills Shows Overturning 'Roe v. Wade' Settled Nothing
- 43rd Circuit Strikes Down NLRB’s Monetary Remedies for Fired Starbucks Workers
- 5Latest Class of Court Officers Sworn into Service in New York
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250