No-deal Brexit could see UK legal sector shed 12,000 jobs and lose £3bn in turnover
New Law Society study sets out 'significant negative effects' of no-deal scenario
August 22, 2018 at 09:03 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The UK legal sector could suffer a £3bn revenue hit and lose 12,000 jobs by 2025 in the event of a 'no-deal' Brexit, according to a new study released by the Law Society.
The study warns against the potentially "significant negative effects" on the legal sector of a hard Brexit, an outcome that is expected to hit turnover growth and economic performance across all sectors, resulting in reduced demand for legal services and a decrease in employment in the legal sector.
In its analysis of both 'soft' and 'hard' Brexit outcomes, the Law Society anticipates a near £3bn loss in turnover to the legal sector by 2025 in the event of a no-deal. The study suggests that, if in such a situation the UK were to fall back on World Trade Organization (WTO) rules, growth in the sector could drop to as low as 1.1% per year – or £30.86bn turnover by 2025 – as opposed to steady growth of 2.1% in a 'soft' Brexit scenario – or £33.83bn turnover.
Both figures contrast starkly with the 4.6% average annual growth the legal sector saw before the 2008 financial crisis.
Though the findings suggest a buoyant market until 2020 – due in large part to an increase in work flowing from post-Brexit regulatory changes – a no-deal scenario is likely to have a serious long-term impact on the legal sector.
A no-deal Brexit, the Law Society forecasts, would result in 12,000 job losses from the sector in 10 years. The study does, however, suggest this will owe not just to Brexit, but also to the increasing adoption of new technology, which during a 20-year period could see the legal workforce shrink by as much as 20%.
The study also suggests that UK legal services exports are unlikely to benefit in the medium term from the weaker pound which, although in recent years has resulted in an uptick in net exports, has already produced benefits that are unlikely to reappear in the longer term.
Highlighting in particular the impact on the City, Slaughter and May partner Jeff Twentyman said: "At best, Brexit will continue to cause disruption and uncertainty for the foreseeable future. Whatever happens in the short term, in the longer term, say over five years and further, London will not always be the easiest and most obvious choice it once was."
City firms have in recent years hedged against the no-deal scenario by registering their lawyers in Belfast, with 1,644 England and Wales solicitors registering since 2016.
Law Society president Christina Blacklaws commented: "Brexit is likely to have a significant negative effect on the legal sector in the medium and longer term. This is largely due to the knock-on impact of Brexit on the wider economy as demand for legal services relies on the success of other sectors of the UK economy.
"A hard Brexit could have a significant impact on employment in the sector, with lower growth and less investment in UK firms leading to lower productivity growth in the sector."
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSemiconductor Component Maker Accused of Deceiving Investors About Market Downturn, Export Curbs
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250