Cooperate or Pray for a Pardon: Advice to Paul Manafort
White collar defense attorneys say the former Trump campaign chairman, found guilty of financial crimes Tuesday, can cooperate or gun for a pardon but must choose one or the other.
August 23, 2018 at 08:55 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Since his indictment last October, Paul Manafort has steadfastly fought the special counsel at every turn as other past advisers of President Donald Trump have struck plea deals, cooperated with investigators and—in the case of Rick Gates—testified for prosecutors in court.
With his conviction Tuesday on tax and bank fraud charges, the former Trump campaign chairman faces the firm prospect of a long prison sentence. And there's more to come as Manafort's defense team readies for another trial, this time in a Washington, D.C., federal court that's set to begin Sept. 17.
Manafort may now find himself at a fork in the road, considering a new course. Indeed, white collar defense lawyers say he has two routes to take: cooperate with the special counsel's office, or angle for a presidential pardon.
Cooperate. If not, pray for a pardon.
“I'd say cooperate,” says Schertler & Onorato's Robert Bennett, a veteran criminal defense attorney in Washington. “Now that you've been convicted, you have a better sense of what you're facing. Make the best possible deal that you can. But if he has a promise of a pardon in his back pocket, with an understanding that he will be pardoned if he does not cooperate, then the strategy makes sense. It's the only explanation for the strategy.”
“You would only go before the firing squad if you were told that, before they pulled the trigger, 'I'm going to put you out of this.' That's the only thing that makes sense for his continuing the fighting,” Bennett added.
Ultimately, Bennett says, defense attorneys have to heed their clients' wishes: “You do essentially what the client wants. That's part of the game.”
For Manafort, the specter of the second trial in Washington, D.C., where he faces a more diverse array of charges, could up the pressure. He might also find more of an uphill climb in the District: The judge overseeing his case, U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson, has largely sided with the government in pretrial motions, and she also ordered Manafort to jail earlier this year.
Manafort also might find a more liberal pool of jurors in D.C. than in the Eastern District of Virginia.
“The obvious and rational thing would be to make a deal,” says Arent Fox partner Peter Zeidenberg, who served as deputy special counsel in the prosecution of Scooter Libby. “They haven't done that so far, so maybe it's the client, maybe it's another game plan, but the obvious thing would be to cut a deal with the government.”
Don't count on an appeal.
Manafort's attorneys have not publicly indicated whether they will appeal the verdict in the financial fraud trial in Virginia. Nor should they pin their hopes on one, Zeidenberg said.
“That's not going to help. It's very unlikely he would win on an appeal,” he said. “And if he did, it would just mean he'd get another trial. … There weren't any cutting-edge legal issues. There wasn't a question of constitutionality of the statute. This was a cut and dry income tax fraud, garden variety stuff. That's not going to get overturned on appeal.”
The case for fighting it out.
Still, with Manafort already facing the prospect of a hefty prison sentence from his conviction in Virginia, he may have little to lose defending himself at trial in Washington, even with all the challenges that come with that case. A few acquittals could help with the public's perception of him. As for the pardon discussion, duking it out in D.C. could endear him to his audience of one: Trump.
“What do you really have to lose? And [the trial's] so soon. It's not like you have to wait a year for the trial. It's in a few weeks,” said one white-collar defense lawyer, who previously served as a federal prosecutor.
“What he really has, if he has anything, it doesn't matter if he gives it up three weeks from now or today if he has stuff Mueller wants,” the former prosecutor added. “The only thing he has to lose is whatever he's paying his attorneys.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawsuit Against Major Food Brands Could Be Sign of Emerging Litigation Over Processed Foods
3 minute readGovernment Attorneys Face Reassignment, Rescinded Job Offers in First Days of Trump Administration
4 minute readLaw Firm Sued for $35 Million Over Alleged Role in Acquisition Deal Collapse
3 minute read4th Circuit Upholds Virginia Law Restricting Online Court Records Access
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250