The Simple Ways Law Firms Can Make Associates Happier
Midlevels associates are an eager but insecure group. So may I suggest you use those attributes to your benefit?
August 26, 2018 at 06:00 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Dear Managing Partners:
Fabulous news. You don't have to do anything radical (or spend much money) to satisfy the troops. Based on the results of The American Lawyer's Midlevel Associates Survey, these associates are inexplicably content. They gave their experience a 4.27 score on a 5-point scale, even though they are billing more than ever. How awesome is that?
In fact, they're respectful of the status quo. Some even answered “nothing” to the question, “What would you change about your firm?” And isn't it incredible that some midlevels wanted to say “thank you” or “keep doing what you're doing” when asked what they'd like to tell the managing partner of their firm?
Of course, there were the complainers—ones who railed about the tyranny of the billable hour, the lack of autonomy and the dearth of information about partnership prospects. Then, there were the idealists who seemed insistent that work-life balance should be a priority in Big Law. Lest balance is addressed, warns one Latham & Watkins associate, the firm will be “left with emotionally less mature individuals who are not well-rounded in life experiences.” (Question: Are mature, well-rounded people really prized commodities at law firms?)
Yet, after sifting through the associates' comments, I'm quite sure you don't have to take the gripes too seriously. These midlevels are an eager, self-impressed but deeply insecure group. So may I suggest you use those attributes to your benefit?
Here are my suggestions to keep associates exactly where you want them without draining your coffers:
Be nice. And send your partners to charm school, if necessary. It's remarkable how little associates expect from their law firm experience. When asked what they found “surprising” about their jobs, associates often answered, “the collegiality,” “how nice everyone is” or “how normal people seem”—as if working with polite, pleasant people was an unexpected perk. Moreover, associates are easily endeared by common decencies. One associate complimented his firm for being “accommodating … when it comes to the 'big' life issues (death of loved ones, etc.).”
Imagine how your firm's score would soar if your firm showed just a smidgen of compassion and your partners actually uttered “please” or “thank you” once in a blue moon.
Whisper some sweet nothings to them. Though associates are clamoring for more clarity in their prospects for making partner, you know you're not going to give them meaningful direction on this score. But if you need them to stay put for your selfish reasons, at least give some encouragement. “Partners should explicitly say they want associates to stay,” says an Arnold & Porter associate.
I know lawyers tend to be repressed, but partners need to show associates a little love. Is it that hard?
Give them little treats—literally. It's not a major complaint, but it's notable. “Improve coffee and beverage selections, make snacks available,” implored a Greenberg Traurig associate. “Better doughnuts on Friday!” wrote a Kirkland & Ellis associate. ”Please give us free, healthy food,” pleaded a Manatt, Phelps & Phillips associate.
Yes, associates making six figures can afford to buy their own munchies. But that's not the point. Associates like little tokens of appreciation. And supplying some high-quality snacks won't break the bank.
Let them bill in their pajamas. A recurring complaint is the lack of flexible work arrangements at some firms. You might think that showing up is good for esprit de corps, but that is so 2006. A Vinson & Elkins associate pleaded to work remotely just one to two days a week: “We would be just as productive but much happier! It would also make national news and be great press showing that V&E is trying to cater to millennials.”
If associates can bill 2,500 hours a year lying on their futons all day, what do you care?
Throw in something trendy. If you insist that associates toil away at the office, at least give them an aesthetic environment. You don't have to hire Gwathmey Siegel to redo the entire office, but at least give them a nice workspace. “My desk is getting old, let's get some electric standing desks,” pleaded a Winston & Strawn associate in Chicago. (That office must be getting shabby because another Winston associate said: “I would like new furniture.”)
Remember, upgrading furniture is much cheaper than giving associates fat bonuses.
More cocktail parties! Maybe it's because we're all social beings. Or maybe it's because it's hard for busy lawyers to make friends outside their firms. For whatever reason, the dearth of socializing opportunities was a persistent complaint.
And yes, alcohol must be served. Despite those cautionary tales about the mischief involving alcohol, facing colleagues stone sober won't cut it. Complains one Fried Frank associate: “Our holiday party should not be an alcohol-free two-hour lunch break in the middle of the workday.” Indeed.
Show them your human side. A few associates expressed the desire for more personal interaction with partners and colleagues. “Instead of a firm dinner-dance, we need a picnic or something where people can bring their families,” wrote one associate. “We need opportunities to actually get to know each other in a meaningful way.”
Imagine that: Associates actually want to get to know you on a personal level. It's almost poignant.
Contact Vivia Chen at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Growing Antitrust Scrutiny of DraftKings and FanDuel
What Qualities Will Distinguish Good from Great Service In 2025?
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250