What Microsoft, Starbucks, Rackspace Expect From Their Outside Counsel
In-house legal professionals at three large organizations agree that hiring the right outside counsel is as much a matter of culture than it is of expertise and ability.
August 27, 2018 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
Legal departments will likely differ in types of legal work they handle, their technological abilities and their size. But when it comes to hiring outside help, many have the same expectations.
At the “Expectations of Outside Counsel: A General Counsel Perspective” session of ILTACON 2018, three in-house legal professionals from some of the biggest companies in the global economy shed light on how they approach hiring outside counsel, and what they expect from these firms.
For Zabrina Jenkins, managing director of litigation at Starbucks Corp., it's important to hire outside counsel who not only have expertise to match the needs of specific matters at hand, but have attitudes that reflect Starbucks' culture.
“My expectation is that you will present to us the best team that you feel matches our matter, our company and our goals,” she said.
Jenkins noted, for instance, “that diversity is one of the top things that is listed in our outside guidelines. … And I will expect that you will take into consideration that we are a diverse company and serve a diverse community.”
And Starbucks, she said, “isn't just speaking in terms of race and gender.”
“You need to understand that when you come to meet with us that is something we value. And you need to demonstrate why your values link with ours,” Jenkins added.
To be sure, while many legal departments want outside counsel to match their values, what values they stress will inevitably differ. In Microsoft's case, Alonzo Barber, an attorney in Microsoft's legal and corporate affairs group, cited “efficiency and being in lockstep” with how the tech company operates as essential.
“We are moving to be as efficient as possible, so we select outside counsel that have that mindset,” he said.
What's more, Barber expects his outside counsel to be on board with Microsoft's core offerings and business, and types of technology aren't an exception.
“It's ironic to me that some outside counsel that are actually customers of ours aren't implementing these cloud technologies,” he added.
Still, David Kilgore, corporate counsel at cloud computing company Rackspace, cautioned that outside counsel shouldn't be adopting technology just to get business.
“I don't want them going to the cloud because they're going to pitch to Rackspace,” he said.
But that doesn't mean tech ignorance is acceptable either. Rackspace's legal department expects outside counsel to have a deep understanding of technology. “You are looking for that technological competence, and you are looking at them understanding [things like] privacy by design.”
In addition to finding the right cultural and technological fit, for some legal departments, flexible pricing is of importance. “If we're doing kind of rotational work, then we are going to do flat fee,” Kilgore said. “But if we are looking for in-depth analysis and advice on a complex matter, we are more likely to see that as a billable hour.”
The legal department at Starbucks takes a similar approach. “Sometimes it makes sense to do billable hour, and sometimes it makes sense to consider flat fee or hybrid, some alternative to the hourly billable rate situation,” Jenkins said.
She added that it's also helpful if outside counsel works with the legal department to initially figure out how much time and effort a matter will likely take before diving in.
It's important to “have that comfort level on both party's sides to say, 'Let's just invest in 'X dollars' to try to figure out how we need to proceed in this particular matter,'” she added.
➤➤ Law firms have never been under more pressure to deliver results and demonstrate value. Have you explored the benefits of Lean Adviser Legal from Law.com?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Files Appeal to DC Circuit Aiming to Intervene in Google Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readInside Track: Why Relentless Self-Promoters Need Not Apply for GC Posts
Trending Stories
- 1Securities Action Targeting Polestar Alleges Mistakes in SEC Filings
- 2Conspiracy Suits Against Quinn Emanuel, Roc Nation Moved to Federal District Court
- 3'Knowledge of Mismatch:' Fed Judge Offers Guidance on How to Hold Banks Accountable for Erroneous Transfers
- 4PAGA Claims Must Now Be 'Headed'
- 5Million-Dollar Verdict: Broward Jury Sides With Small Business
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250