Labor of Law: Revving Up 'Epic Systems' | Press Releases & #MeToo Under Microscope | Plus: Who Got the Work & Notable Moves
This week, we're looking at some recent rulings that pick up—and extend—the Supreme Court's Epic Systems ruling this term. Plus: How the ex-Barnes & Noble CEO's wrongful termination suit raises bigger questions in the #MeToo era. And scroll down for all the big new cases and notable moves. This is Labor of Law.
August 30, 2018 at 12:00 PM
7 minute read
Welcome to Labor of Law. More courts are applying the reach of the U.S. Supreme Court's Epic Systems ruling. A broad pay-data disclosure bill failed in California, and the U.S. Labor Department submits its new take on pay-data investigations. More optics than substance? Plus: Scroll down for notable moves and who got the work. Lots of new cases, including the Barnes & Noble ex-CEO suing for wrongful termination.
I'm Erin Mulvaney in Washington, D.C., covering labor and employment from the Swamp to Silicon Valley. Follow this weekly newsletter for the latest analysis and happenings. If you have a story idea, feedback or just want to say hi, I'm at [email protected] and on Twitter @erinmulvaney.
|Would you like to receive Labor of Law as an email? Sign up here.
|
Broad Reach of 'Epic Systems'
Federal appeals courts are giving the Supreme Court's “Epic Systems” worker-arbitration ruling test drives. In recent weeks, two decisions from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit caught some attention. Earlier this month, a panel, led by Trump appointee Amul Thapar, extended the ruling's reach to the Fair Labor Standards Act in the case Gaffers v. Kelly Services. (The Supreme Court case only confronted the National Labor Relations Act.)
Now a new ruling in the Sixth Circuit applies both Epic and Gaffers to independent contractors. “The holdings of Epic and Gaffers mean that individual arbitration agreements are enforceable against both employees and independent contractors,” Judge Alice Batchelder wrote for the panel in McGrew v. VCG Holding Corp. The court ruled against a group of exotic dancers who wanted to form a class action to sue over alleged labor violations.
The decision shows how gig companies could stand to benefit from the U.S. Supreme Court's Epic Systems decision, according to Fisher Phillips partner Richard Meneghello.
“This is welcome news for gig companies, as the ruling demonstrates that this standard can apply to federal misclassification proceedings,” Meneghello said in a recent blog post. He added, “While we can't predict whether other federal appeals courts will rule in this same manner, signs are positive that the Epic ruling could be an epic piece of good fortune for gig companies defending against misclassification cases.”
The case McGrew v. VCG Holding Corp. centers around a Louisville adult club that required dancers to sign agreements that included a class waiver provision. The agreement doomed the case, and a trial judge dismissed the complaint. The club, of course, is not a gig company, but the misclassification issue has plagued on-demand businesses.
➤➤ Which brings us to… California, home to many gig companies.
Misclassification is the topic du jour here. The Epic Systems decision certainly could help companies resist efforts of employees trying to band together to challenge workplace inequities. At the same time, these companies are facing a bigger issue: fallout from the California Supreme Court ruling in Dynamex Operations West. That's the decision we've seen a lot on—and we'll see more of. The decision makes it harder for companies to justify their workers as independent contractors.
There's been intense lobbying in recent weeks—as business advocates press state lawmakers to make some move to check the full effect of the ruling. The days in the session are dwindling. “There's no hint as of yet, however, that this lobbying will have any impact on the legislature; hiring entities need to proceed under the assumption that the ABC Test is the new normal when it comes to misclassification,” Meneghello wrote in his recent blog.
Bottomline: California-based employers “need to adjust to the new reality and assume things aren't going to be changing,” he declared.
|
Who Got the Work
>> Former Barnes & Noble chief executive Demos Parneros is suing for alleged wrongful termination and defamation in Manhattan federal district court. Debra Raskin and Anne Clark of New York's Vladeck, Raskin & Clark represent Parneros, who claims Barnes & Noble issued a “false” press release about his termination. Senior partner Daniel Kramer at Paul, Weiss, Rifkin, Wharton & Garrison is counsel to Barnes & Noble. The NLJ has more here on how the case raises issues about what companies are saying, and to whom, about fired executives in the #MeToo era.
>> A team from Faegre Baker Daniels represented Wells Fargo in a federal appeals case where a group of African-American and Latino employees and would-be hires alleged discriminatory employment practices. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit on Wednesday ruled for Wells Fargo. The plaintiffs were represented by teams from Newkirk Zwagerman Law Firm and Goldstein, Borgen, Dardarian & Ho. Read more at The Recorder.
>> The Swiss bank UBS Group AG has hired Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer “to review how the bank handled a complaint from a young female trainee who alleged that a senior male colleague raped her,” according to Bloomberg.
>> Employment attorney John Singer of New York's Singer Deutsch has emerged as the go-to lawyer for Wall Street men who are accused of unwanted advances and other misconduct. He has taken on a crop of clients taking on their former Wall Street employers. The Wall Street Journal has more.
>> Epstein Becker Green partner John Fullerton III in New York represented Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp. in a whistleblower case at the U.S. Labor Department. An administrative law judge last week, issuing a 38-page ruling, dismissed pro se claims of alleged retaliation.
|
Notable Moves & Promotions
>> Ondray Harris has joined Hunton Andrews Kurth's labor and employment practice as a special counsel in Washington. Harris served less than eight months as the director of the U.S. Labor Department's Office of Federal Contractor Compliance Programs. Read more at Bloomberg Law.
>> Cozen O'Connor has hired four labor and employment attorneys from Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney. The firm said Mariah Passarelli and Bethany Salvatore are joining as members, and Abigail Green and Tiffany Jenca as associates.
>> Jackson Lewis hired Suzanne Odom in its Greenville office from Nexsen Pruet, where she focused on ERISA, employee benefits and executive compensation issues.
|
Around the Water Cooler
>> The Labor Department issued a long-awaited directive detailing how federal compliance officers will tackle pay compensation audits for contractors. Employment attorneys say the change could be more optics than substance. [NLJ]
>> NLRB Democratic member Mark Gaston Pearce was renominated to a new term this week. Business advocates had urged the White House to pick a more business-friendly member for the seat. [BNA]
>> New York released new draft sexual harassment prevention policy for employers, a model for companies to build on. Several policies will be required when the state's law takes effect in October. [New York Law Journal]
>> More affordable options are beginning to emerge for workers in the gig economy for benefits such as insurance and health care. Companies and groups are forming to offer services that the employers do not. [CNN Money]
>> The #MeToo movement inspired a wave of proposed legislation to curb sexual assault. Yet, a survey of state legislatures shows about half have followed through and many have died in committee. [Associated Press]
>> California abandoned a bill that would have required businesses to report pay data to state regulators. The reports would have been confidential. [The Recorder]
>> Questions remain after a Washington federal court rejected Trump's executive orders against federal unions. Will he obey? [Washington Post]
Thanks for reading. Please shoot me a note with feedback, story ideas or tips to [email protected]. Happy Labor Day!
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLabor of Law: As Workers Suffer With Long Covid, Employers May Rethink Accommodations for Other Disabilities
Labor of Law: Federal Noncompete Ban Would Be Far From Last Word on Issue
Labor of Law: New Federal Rule Could Upend State Efforts to Count Ride-Share Drivers as Contractors
Labor of Law: Employer Statements on Abortion Could Spur Discrimination, Hostile Work Environment Claims
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250