'Who Is Bill Burck?' Not the Only Big Law Attorney Reviewing Kavanaugh Documents
Quinn Emanuel's Bill Burck was oft-mentioned at Kavanaugh's confirmation hearing Tuesday. His document-review team includes lawyers from Kirkland & Ellis and Baker Botts.
September 04, 2018 at 02:43 PM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation hearing began Tuesday with bitter dialogue among members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, as Democrats protested they had been denied access to tens of thousands of pages pertinent to their review of President Donald Trump's nominee to replace Justice Anthony Kennedy on the Supreme Court.
Amid the pandemonium came a question from Sen. Dick Durbin, one of the committee's senior-most Democratic members: “Who is Bill Burck?”
“By what authority can he restrict the information given to the Senate Judiciary Committee and the American people? Is he a government employee? No one knew this mysterious Bill Burck, who is filtering these documents,” Durbin said, recalling questions he asked of Kavanaugh during their meeting.
The events of 2018 have made Burck, a partner at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, even more of a known quantity. Burck has been working with dozens of lawyers to review those records and transmit them to the Senate Judiciary Committee. Some of those documents have been made public. Others, not so. Burck's team of lawyers, working for former President George W. Bush, designated some of the records “committee confidential.”
Burck, co-managing partner of Quinn Emanuel's Washington office, is also representing White House counsel Donald McGahn along with at least a half dozen other current or former Trump aides in their dealings with the special counsel investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election. His name came up repeatedly Tuesday at Kavanaugh's confirmation hearing, which is expected to last through the week. Democrats urged the Republicans to pause the proceeding to allow the full scope of records to be reviewed and released. “All of these documents will come out,” Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Connecticut, vowed.
Republicans resisted Democrats' claims that they were being left in the dark about the full scope of Kavanaugh's work at the Bush White House, where he served as a counsel and staff secretary, the gatekeeper for information that reaches the president.
“No White House would allow every piece of paper that went to and from the president to be made public,” Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, said. He called the documents “utterly irrelevant” to what Kavanaugh thinks or believes, and would only lead to a “fishing expedition” and an attempt to “distract and delay.”
Judiciary Chairman Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, said the document review of Bush's records complied with the Presidential Records Act, which gives former presidents the chance to review records before they are released. “The National Archives was not cut out of the process,” Grassley said.
Burck did not work alone in the document review process. His team included two Texas-based attorneys: Kirkland & Ellis partner Brigham Cannon and Evan Young, an Austin-based partner at Baker Botts. Cannon and Young did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
“I get the interest in my popping up in some of the big issues of the day,” Burck told the New York Times in a recent profile. “But it's a mistake to believe lawyers are interesting because their clients are.”
Cannon joined Kirkland & Ellis in 2011 following a four-year stint at the U.S. Justice Department, where he was a trial attorney in the criminal division's fraud section. He was recognized for helping the investigation and prosecution of Lee Bentley Farkas, the former chairman of the private mortgage company Taylor, Bean & Whitaker, who was found guilty of orchestrating a nearly $3 billion fraud that contributed to the failure of Colonial Bank.
As a partner in Kirkland & Ellis' Houston office, Cannon has represented clients in investigations into violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, along with health care and securities fraud. In 2016, he represented the generic drug giant Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Inc. in a $520 million settlement with the Justice Department and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission resolving allegations that the company and its Russian subsidiary paid millions of dollars in bribes to government officials in Russia, Ukraine and Mexico.
Cannon last donated to a political campaign in 2012, when he contributed $350 to former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney's presidential bid. He donated an additional $250 that year to a political action committee supporting Romney, who is now the Republican nominee to replace retiring U.S. Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah.
Young is a former clerk for the late Justice Antonin Scalia who has argued before the U.S. Supreme Court. Following his clerkship, Young served from 2006 to 2008 as counsel to Attorneys General Alberto Gonzales and Michael Mukasey.
Outside the Austin office of Baker Botts, where he is chairman of the litigation department, Young teaches at the University of Texas School of Law. He has taught “Federal Courts” since 2015, according to the school's website.
Earlier this year, Young filed an amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to consider the deference courts give government agencies in enacting federal laws and regulations. Filed on behalf of trade groups, the brief asked the high court to “reevaluate the legitimacy of this doctrine” of deference, saying it had enable the “erosion of the judiciary's role in assessing executive assertions of authority.”
Young has also involved himself in Texas politics. In May, he contributed $1,000 to the re-election campaign of U.S. Rep. John Carter, a Republican who represents the northern suburbs of Austin. Federal election disclosures show that Young has also donated in recent years to the campaigns of three other Texas Republicans: U.S. Reps. Michael McCaul, Bill Flores and Roger Williams.
Young is married to Tobi Young, a clerk to Justice Neil Gorsuch. Before her clerkship, Tobi Young was counsel to the George W. Bush Presidential Library Center. Young formerly was the designated Presidential Records Act representative for Bush.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllScammers Target Lawyers Across Country With Fake Court Notices
Judge Cannon Says She Has No Relationship With Trump and Won't Step Down From Attempted Assassination Case
State, Federal Courts in North Carolina Announce Reopening Dates Following Hurricane Helene
Many Judges Earn Less Than Lawyers: Texas Judiciary Asks for 30% Raise
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Jury Says $118M: Netlist Wins Another Patent Verdict Against Samsung
- 2Big Law Communications, Media Attorneys Brace For Changes Under Trump
- 3Will England Accept that Digital Assets Are ‘Property’?
- 4Congress and Courts Are Considering Litigation Financing: Is Disclosure Imminent?
- 5Bar Report — Nov. 25, 2024
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250