Linklaters to keep on 73% of trainees, rounding out solid magic circle retention rates
Linklaters to keep on 43 of its 59-strong intake
September 06, 2018 at 08:57 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Linklaters has become the last of the magic circle to confirm its autumn trainee retention rates, keeping on 73% of its new qualifiers – the lowest percentage within its peer group.
The firm is keeping on 43 of its 59-strong intake as newly qualified lawyers, compared with an equivalent retention rate of 84% last autumn.
Graduate recruitment partner Richard Hodgson said: "We are pleased to once again retain a good number of quality lawyers from our September intake. I look forward to seeing their careers progress as they pursue exciting opportunities within a best-in-class and globally minded firm."
Linklaters has the largest intake of its peers but its retention rate is marginally lower.
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer is keeping on 34 of its 41 September qualifiers (83%), with Allen & Overy (A&O) retaining 37 of its 46-strong cohort (80%). Slaughter and May, meanwhile, is holding on to 86% of its new starters – keeping 35 out of 37, while Clifford Chance (CC) is keeping on 36 of its 47 trainees – 77%.
Looking at the year as a whole, Slaughter and May is the marginal frontrunner, having retained 67 of a possible 74 NQs in 2018 across its spring and autumn intakes for a 91% retention figure overall. CC and Linklaters are narrowly behind, having kept on 80 of 95, and 90 of 107 qualifiers respectively for an 84% final result.
Confirmation of the latest retention rates comes after a number of firms have boosted trainee and NQ salary rates in recent weeks.
Last month, Freshfields and CC boosted salaries for their London trainees, with CC also pushing up total compensation for NQs up to £91,000 from £87,300 last year. A&O's base NQ rate has risen by 2.5% to £83,000, with Slaughters opting to hold NQ pay steady at £80,000. Linklaters has yet to confirm associate pay.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSorry. We Can't Get to Your Case: Judge Speaks Out on Judicial Shortages
'Quiet, Appropriate End:' NY Court of Appeals Formally Removes Erin Gall From Bench
Despite Brexit, UK Lawyers Still Dominate on Big EU Antitrust Lawsuits
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Many LA County Law Firms Remain Open, Mobilize to Support Affected Employees Amid Historic Firestorm
- 2Stevens & Lee Names New Delaware Shareholder
- 3U.S. Supreme Court Denies Trump Effort to Halt Sentencing
- 4From CLO to President: Kevin Boon Takes the Helm at Mysten Labs
- 5How Law Schools Fared on California's July 2024 Bar Exam
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250