Hurricane Florence's Arrival Shuts Down Carolina Courts
State and federal courts in the Carolinas, as well as law schools, have suspended their operations as the storm begins to throttle the area with heavy rains and high winds.
September 13, 2018 at 01:07 PM
4 minute read
On Thursday morning, Hurricane Florence began its assault on the coast of the Carolinas.
The storm is projected to bring winds of up to 80 mph and storm surges as high as 13 feet to the region in the coming days. But it has already affected the legal community in the area by prompting the closure of the region's courts and law schools.
State courts had already announced numerous shutdowns across the Carolinas as of Wednesday afternoon. North Carolina's state judicial branch reported that courts in at least 59 counties, most of them in the state's eastern half, were closed or had plans to close.
Many of the closures had taken effect on Wednesday, but some courts were scheduled to close on Thursday or Friday. The state's judicial branch has been updating an information page and its Twitter page as new closures are announced, and where relevant, the site also provides information about alternative court locations.
In South Carolina, state Supreme Court Chief Justice Donald Beatty issued a directive on Tuesday indicating that court proceedings in a number of counties would be canceled for Wednesday. The order also said that court proceedings would also be canceled in any counties where state and county government offices were closed, and would only resume once those offices reopen.
The chief justice said up-to-date information on those office closings would be compiled by the South Carolina Emergency Management Division, which was maintaining a website. The state agency listed 19 counties with offices that had either closed or were scheduled to close early on Thursday.
In an interview on Wednesday, Roger Young, the chief administrative judge for the South Carolina Business Court in Charleston, said that effectively all courthouses in the state east of I-95 were already closed. He also noted that, with the hurricane's path tracking in a more southwesterly direction than originally predicted, additional courts in the state would likely be impacted as well.
Many of the federal courthouses in the Carolinas were also temporarily shuttered in anticipation of Florence.
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina closed three of its six locations on Wednesday, shutting down courthouses in Greenville, New Bern and Wilmington. Those three courthouses plus the Raleigh and Elizabeth City locations were also scheduled to be closed on Thursday and Friday. The Eastern District is providing further updates on its website.
The Western District of North Carolina, meanwhile, had plans to close at noon on Friday but remain open on Wednesday and Thursday, according to Frank Johns, clerk of the district court. He said that schedule would apply to both district and bankruptcy courts.
In South Carolina, the federal district court announced the closure of its Charleston location starting on Tuesday and continuing until further notice. The federal courthouse in Florence, South Carolina, was also expected to close but not until Thursday, and the district also announced that it would cancel U.S. Central Violations Bureau matters scheduled to take place on Friday in Columbia.
Law schools in the Carolinas have also closed their doors.
The University of North Carolina School of Law, canceled classes for through the week starting at 5 p.m. on Tuesday. As of earlier this week, North Carolina Central University School of Law was also suspending classes through Friday. Wake Forest University School of Law has announced it will close its facilities through the weekend, and Campbell University Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law has stopped classes through the week.
In South Carolina, the Charleston School of Law, which is directly in the storm's path, suspended its operations at noon on Tuesday and does not plan to reopen again until Sept. 17.
Rebekah Mintzer and Karen Sloan contributed reporting to this story.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUChicago Law Professors Release Desk Reference Breaking Down Crypto, Web 3 for Attorneys
4 minute readDean Developments: 2 Law Schools Appoint New Leadership, ABF Elects New Fellow
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Dog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
- 2Lululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
- 3Plaintiff Gets $500K Policy Limit Without Surgery
- 4Philadelphia Bar Association Executive Director Announces Retirement
- 5SEC Chair Gary Gensler to Resign on Trump's Inauguration Day
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250