Class Action Filed Over Deadly Gas Explosions in Massachusetts
The lawsuit is the first filed after explosions in the Merrimack Valley region that forced thousands to evacuate, injured over 20 and killed one on Sept. 13.
September 18, 2018 at 03:39 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Morgan & Morgan has filed the first lawsuit over damages caused by dozens of gas explosions that rocked Massachusetts last week.
The law firm filed the class action on Tuesday in Essex County Superior Court in Massachusetts on behalf of residents of the Merrimack Valley region, including the 8,600 forced to evacuate after gas line operator Columbia Gas of Massachusetts shut off their pipes. The explosions, which occurred on Sept. 13 in the towns of Andover, North Andover and Lawrence, killed one teenager and injured more than 20 others.
The lawsuit was filed by a Lawrence resident who was unable to get her dog from her home and spent the night on a stranger's floor on the evening of the gas explosions. It seeks compensation for lost property value and income, relocation costs and other monetary damages, as well as injunctive relief and punitive damages.
“Our goal is to ensure residents in these three towns have access to justice and that the company is held accountable,” said Morgan & Morgan partner Frank Petosa during a conference call with reporters on Tuesday. “What we're seeking to do is to hold both companies accountable for what happened and ensure the members of the class have access to justice and compensation for any losses they've suffered.”
Petosa, in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, filed the suit along with his colleagues Rene Rocha in New Orleans and Tyler Church in Boston.
Ken Stammen, a spokesman for NiSource Inc., which owns Columbia Gas, wouldn't comment on the litigation, though he noted that the company is “fully committed to responding to the needs of people who are suffering because of this incident.” Columbia Gas previously has said it plans to replace 48 miles of cast iron and bare steel in its distribution lines with modern plastic pipes as part of a program in collaboration with the governor's office.
“This unprecedented event requires unprecedented action,” said NiSource CEO Joe Hamrock in a statement on Sunday. “We lost the trust of this community and are 100 percent committed to restoring safety, confidence and peace of mind for everyone in this community. Over time, we hope to earn back the trust we lost during this incident.”
Columbia Gas also has set up a property claims process to help pay for “evacuation expenses, food spoilage, child care costs, etc.”
Two other law firms, New York's Bragar Eagel & Squire and Los Angeles-based Glancy Prongay & Murray, are investigating potential lawsuits on behalf of shareholders of NiSource, whose stock fell on the day of the gas explosions.
The National Transportation Safety Board is investigating the cause of the explosions. According to a letter sent on Monday to Columbia Gas officials from legislators including U.S. Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Edward Markey, both Democrats in Massachusetts, the pressure was 12 times higher than it should have been in the pipes.
The lawsuit brings claims of strict liability for ultra-hazardous activities and negligence, alleging that the gas distribution system was “poorly maintained, antiquated, obsolete, and highly dangerous.” It lists prior incidences involving Columbia Gas. The Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities, for instance, has fined Columbia Gas $100,000 for improper maintenance issues over several years, and, in 2012, a gas line in Springfield caused an explosion that injured 21 people. Months later, a gas line operated by another NiSource subsidiary exploded in Sissonville, West Virginia.
“This is a shock to people in the area, but it is not a surprise to Columbia Gas Co.,” Robert Kennedy Jr., a partner in Morgan & Morgan's New York office, told reporters on Tuesday. “I've been involved in litigation against Columbia all over the country.”
In the conference call, Petosa told reporters that Morgan & Morgan would be conducting its own investigation to provide “another voice” to the NTSB and other government authorities. The firm's lawyers plan to be in Lawrence on Thursday for a town hall session with public officials, Kennedy said.
The lawsuit does not seek compensation for injuries, property damages or losses to businesses, all of which could be part of future individual lawsuits, Petosa said. Lawyers said their suit sought to provide more adequate relief than a compensation fund announced on Tuesday by Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker that includes a $10 million contribution from Columbia Gas.
Kennedy said that the government, and not just Columbia Gas, was at fault in this case. He also noted that Morgan & Morgan was involved in lawsuits over the Deepwater Horizon oil spill litigation and the gas leak cases in California, both of which had similar compensation programs.
“We found there was a collaboration, a disturbing collaboration, between the regulated industry and the regulators who were supposed to protect the public,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllStatute of Limitations Shrivels $5M Jury Award to Less than $1M, 8th Circuit Rules
4 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readArizona Board Gives Thumbs Up to KPMG's Bid To Deliver Legal Services
Goodwin to Launch Brussels Office With Quinn Emanuel Antitrust Partner
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250