Walmart's In-House Counsel Tells How the Retail Giant Is Changing Its Legal Ops
Alan Bryan, senior associate general counsel of Walmart Inc., told lawyers at the 15th Annual Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel Symposium in Philadelphia why and how the legal department developed its legal operations function to control spending.
September 18, 2018 at 04:20 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Walmart Inc. sells billions of pounds of bananas every year. In one month, however, the legal department will spend more than what the company sells in bananas, Alan Bryan, senior associate general counsel, told a crowd of attorneys on Tuesday at the 15th annual Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel Symposium in Philadelphia. That major cost, he said, prompted the need for the legal department to develop a legal operations function and control spending.
“In a month of legal spend we will more than eclipse our year of banana sales,” Bryan quipped. “That gives you an idea of why you have to become more efficient and why legal departments have been.”
He explained that until the turn of this century, the large retailer was heavily leveraging outside counsel and realized that, along with the policy of taking all cases to trial, needed to change. The first issue that Walmart needed to fix was a lack of centralization in the legal department.
Walmart's legal department first put all of their outside counsel on the same engagement letter—they decided to have the same terms for all outside counsel.
“What we had found is that sometimes with the same firm, we would have different engagement letters,” Bryan explained.
Walmart's legal department then took all of the data it collected over the years and organized it to be easily searchable.
“We wanted to be able to accomplish an accurate way of reporting out on things like spend and the performance of outside counsel,” Bryan said.
There was also a turn toward time-saving technology that would allow lawyers to take more time to focus on more difficult tasks.
“We announced a partnership with a company called LegalMation and we're using software to take a complaint filed against the company—generally speaking in tort and in general litigation matters—feeding that complaint into the system and the system, within two minutes, kicks out an answer, a first set of interrogatories and a first set of requests for production. That is reviewed by an attorney but what we've found is that it is saving 60 to 70 percent of the time that would normally take to review that complaint,” Bryan explained.
For Nathan Brown, corporate counsel at The Kroger Co., its technology is not on par with Walmart. However, the values and ideas for creating the most efficient legal department are the same.
“They [Walmart officials] are really the thought leaders in this space,” said Brown, who used to work in-house at Walmart.
At Kroger, Brown explained, the principles are the same and communication with outside counsel is key for keeping costs down. He explained that every couple of years Kroger will bring in its outside counsel to make sure their goals are the same.
“It's surprising sometimes how many of them get and become our rock-star outside counsel and some that just don't get it and sit in the back and work on their phones,” Brown said.
At Kroger, Brown said he is against a process-based approach to litigation. He explained that every case is different and it's important for both outside and inside counsel to understand that.
“I really want people who are proactive and know what our appetite for risk is before they just say 'well this is my plan and here is my budget' and it looks like every other plan that I see on every other case,” Brown said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCEOs Want Data-Based Risk Management; GCs Lack the Tech to Do So.
UnitedLex Fishes 5 New Hires From Big Four Talent Pool
COVID-19, Remote Work and Cybersecurity Threats: 7 Pointers for In-House Counsel
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250