More Bad News for Bill Cosby: Law Firm Sues for More Than $282K in Legal Fees
Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis claims Cosby began failing to pay his bills to the firm last August.
September 27, 2018 at 10:38 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Legal Intelligencer
In its lawsuit against Bill Cosby, Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis is claiming the convicted sex offender failed to pay legal bills in the hundreds of thousands of dollars.
In a complaint filed Sept. 21, the firm said it is seeking payment of $282,948, plus late fees, costs and interest, from the now-imprisoned comedian. The firm filed a writ of summons earlier this month in the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas.
Cosby was sentenced Tuesday to three to 10 years in state prison for sexually assaulting Andrea Constand in 2004. Schnader Harrison partner Sam Silver has represented Cosby in both civil and criminal cases.
According to the complaint, Cosby signed an engagement letter with Schnader Harrison in March 2016, just a few months after the criminal charges against Cosby were filed in Montgomery County. Cosby paid for work completed through the end of June 2017, the complaint said, but has not paid any of the firm's invoices submitted between August 2017 and July 25 of this year.
Silver continued to represent Cosby leading up to the April 2018 criminal proceedings, the complaint said, despite not receiving payments from Cosby. He billed about $183,000 in December 2017 and January 2018, it said.
Cosby's spokesman and other employees made several promises to Schnader Harrison since then that the payments were forthcoming, the complaint said, but they never were paid. On Aug. 30, the complaint said, Silver told Cosby's new lawyers by email that the firm would file a lawsuit on Sept. 4 if it was not paid by then.
“Counsel's response was to assert that if Schnader started a lawsuit, Cosby would question the invoices,” the complaint said. “Counsel suggested that Schnader forego [sic] a lawsuit, agree to confidentiality and participate in a binding 'arbitration/mediation.'”
Silver withdrew from Cosby's criminal case in January, before the retrial had begun. He was replaced at the time by lawyer Lane Vines of Berger Montague.
Silver also represented Cosby in a breach-of-contract lawsuit against the comedian's accuser, Constand, which Cosby has since dropped. Cosby had alleged that Constand violated a settlement agreement the pair reached in 2006 by cooperating with law enforcement in the criminal case.
Cosby's legal team has become a revolving-door operation, with several local and out-of-state lawyers having come and gone since he was charged in December 2015.
Brian McMonagle, a name partner at Philadelphia firm McMonagle, Perri, McHugh & Mischak, was the only lawyer to stay with Cosby from his indictment through the first trial, which ended in a hung jury in 2017. Christopher Tayback and Joseph Sarles of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan in Los Angeles and Monique Pressley of The Pressley Firm in Washington, D.C., started with him, but they withdrew in 2016.
California lawyer Angela Agrusa entered her appearance in the fall of 2016, and worked on the first trial with McMonagle. They both withdrew from the case in August last year, as the retrial was approaching.
For his second trial, Cosby turned to lead defense lawyers Tom Mesereau and Kathleen Bliss, appellate lawyer Becky James and local counsel Vines. They all withdrew their appearance after Cosby was found guilty on all three counts of aggravated indecent assault in April.
Local lawyers Joseph P. Green and Peter Goldberger are now representing Cosby. Green did not respond to requests for comment Wednesday.
In addition to his prison sentence, Cosby is expected to pay fees to the state as well. His sentence came with a $25,000 penalty and an order to pay costs of prosecution, which the Montgomery County District Attorney's Office has said were more than $43,000.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPhila. Med Mal Lawyers In for Busy Year as Court Adjusts for Filing Boom
3 minute readEDPA's New Chief Judge Plans to Advance Efforts to Combat Threats to Judiciary
3 minute read'Families Take on Many Forms': 3rd Circuit Clarifies Who Qualifies as 'Parent' Under IDEA
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1So You Want to be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
- 2US District Judge in North Carolina Will Take Senior Status
- 3From 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
- 4Critical Mass With Law.com’s Amanda Bronstad: Why Jurors in California Failed to Reach Verdict Over Zantac, Bankruptcy Judge Tables Sanctions Against Beasley Allen Attorney
- 5Jones Day Client Seeks Indemnification for $7.2M Privacy Settlement, Plus Defense Costs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250