Susman Godfrey to Give All Associates Unlimited Paid Parental Leave
The firm, which often has led Big Law with its generous wage and benefit plans, is now offering associates a longer paid parental leave policy that is gender-neutral.
October 02, 2018 at 02:41 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Susman Godfrey has expanded its parental leave policy for associates, providing unlimited paid parental leave to all new parents, regardless of gender or whether they gave birth or are a caregiver.
Associates can determine the length of their leave, but the hours will be annualized for bonus purposes of up to 18 weeks for women who give birth and up to 12 weeks for any associate. This means their time off will not count against them for bonus purposes. The prior policy provided up to 16 weeks for a woman who delivered a baby and up to four weeks for other parents.
The new parental leave policy follows the Houston-based trial firm's announcement in 2015 of an unlimited paid vacation policy for associates.
Susman Godfrey partner Erica Harris said the firm's partnership decided to expand the parental leave policy because the market is moving toward offering additional time for all new parents.
“There's a recognition that all parents need and want time with their children, and while the fact that you are a delivering mother adds an additional burden that justifies additional time, everybody needed more time,” Harris said.
The new policy was an “easy move” for the firm, she said. In fact, there was such broad support for the proposal among partners that they didn't even hold an official roll-call vote, Harris said.
“No one objected or spoke against it, so it was adopted by acclamation,” she said.
The firm's prior policy provided 16 weeks of paid parental leave to women who delivered a baby and four weeks to any other parent. Harris said associates could actually take a longer paid leave under the firm's unlimited vacation policy, but the new policy formalizes that opportunity as a gender-neutral parental leave policy.
Under the new policy, associates can take a longer period of time off and still get credit for the time for bonus purposes.
Susman Godfrey has often bested the legal market when it comes to associate and partner pay and benefits. In June, the firm adopted a new associate salary scale that tops the Cravath scale adopted by many Big Law firms this year. The firm also in June adopted a policy that sets the mandatory retirement policy at age 100.
Harris said the partners looked at the firm's parental leave policy after an associate pointed out to a partner that another firm had a parental leave policy that was more gender-neutral. The firm determined that it, too, wanted to adopt a policy that was gender-neutral, but also wanted to offer the most generous policy.
Other firms are indeed sweetening parent leave policies. On Monday, Dechert changed its parental leave policy to provide at least 12 weeks of paid leave for all U.S. lawyers and employees regardless of gender. The new policy provides women who give birth up to 20 weeks of paid leave.
Susman Godfrey has a total of 139 lawyers, including 48 associates, in offices in Houston, Seattle, New York and Los Angeles.
READ MORE:
Susman Godfrey Tops Cravath Scale for All Associates; Starting Pay Set at $195K
Susman Godfrey Adopts Retirement Policy: At Age 100, You're Out!
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Once the LA Fires Are Extinguished, Expect the Litigation to Unfold for Years
5 minute read
These Law Firm Leaders Are Optimistic About 2025, Citing Deal Pipeline, International Business
6 minute read
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
