Stranded Arizona Summit Law Students Won't Finish JDs at ASU
The struggling institution had hoped students could complete their degrees at the nearby Arizona State University Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law, but the American Bar Association has nixed that plan.
October 08, 2018 at 02:08 PM
3 minute read
|
It appears that the Arizona State University Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law won't be coming to the rescue of Arizona Summit Law School students left stranded by the potentially permanent closure of their school after all.
The American Bar Association has directed the teetering Arizona Summit Law School to help current students come up with individualized plans to finish out their law degrees, rather than pursue a teach-out plan that would allow all remaining students to complete their studies at a single campus, as many had hoped to do at nearby ASU law. (Both law schools are located in downtown Phoenix, though Arizona Summit shuttered its physical campus in August and reportedly has not been paying its rent.)
Arizona Summit canceled its fall semester after losing its ABA accreditation in June, but has not said it's shutting down. It has appealed the revocation of its accreditation and is awaiting a decision from the ABA and has also filed suit against the ABA for what it charges are unfair accreditation practices.
An Arizona Summit spokesperson did not respond to requests for comment Monday, but interim president Peter Goplerud told The Arizona Republic newspaper that the ABA determined that the best way forward for students is to devise individual plans for each.
“What the ABA is doing is really helping us make sure that the students are all on the best path forward to complete their degrees,” he told the Arizona Republic.
Arizona Summit students were informed of the decision in an email Oct. 5. That email urged them to immediately contact the school to determine next steps.
An ABA spokesman reached Monday declined to comment on the situation. ASU Law assistant dean Thomas Williams said Monday that Summit Law did, in fact, submit a teach-out plan to the ABA that involved ASU, but that ASU had not formally agreed to that plan, likely prompting the ABA to reject it.
When it became public in August that the schools were in talks about a teach-out plan, ASU Law officials expressed both a desire to help Arizona Summit students and reservations that their school could accommodate them and that Arizona Summit students would be able to keep up with the school's rigorous program.
Arizona Summit students have already had to decide the best course of action for their situation. ASU Law opened its doors to third-year Arizona Summit students within a semester of graduation on the condition they be considered visiting students, but only a handful took up that offer. Others have opted to transfer to Arizona Summit's sister school, Florida Coastal School of Law. Still others have put their studies on hold pending the ABA appeal.
In an unexpected twist, 25 former Arizona Summit students transferred to the University of North Dakota School of Law. Unlike many other campuses, North Dakota agreed to transfer all the former Arizona Summit students' credits.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMore Big Law Firms Rush to Match Associate Bonuses, While Some Offer Potential for Even More
Dog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
4 minute readIn Talc Bankruptcy, Andy Birchfield Skipped His Deposition. Could He Face Sanctions?
6 minute readGC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1First California Zantac Jury Ends in Mistrial
- 2Democrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal with GOP
- 3Trump Taps Former Fla. Attorney General for AG
- 4Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 5Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250