Well, That Was Awful
The fight over the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court was stomach-churning and angry and sad, and it's left the high court further politicized.
October 08, 2018 at 09:27 AM
4 minute read
It's over. Brett Kavanaugh was confirmed on Saturday by a vote of 50 to 48 as the 114th justice of the Supreme Court.
It makes you wonder—is this how confirmations are going to be from now on?
I'm with Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who said last month that “The way it was was right. The way it is is wrong.”
I do suspect that the next nominee—whether liberal or conservative—will be a woman. It's not that a woman couldn't be accused of sexually assaulting someone (see Asia Argento) but it's certainly a lot less likely that plausible allegations of misconduct would emerge. In this context, a woman is a much safer pick.
Another takeaway is that Michael Avenatti's star has dimmed, perhaps irreparably. Avenatti, who has expressed interest in a 2020 presidential run, represented Julie Swetnick, who said in an affidavit that she “witnessed efforts by … Kavanaugh … to cause girls to become inebriated and disoriented so they could then be 'gang raped' in a side room.”
Senator Susan Collins in justifying her vote to back Kavanaugh called Swetnick's allegations “outlandish” and said her claim was “put forward without any supporting evidence.”
A series of articles has followed: “Did Michael Avenatti help doom the case against Brett Kavanaugh?” asked the Washington Post. “Democrats say Avenatti undercut their case against Kavanaugh” said CNN. “Mitch McConnell owes Michael Avenatti a gift basket,” opined the Washington Examiner. Chuck Todd on MSNBC said Michael Avenatti is 'probably the best thing to happen to Brett Kavanaugh.' Swetnick's allegations are reminiscent of an anonymous lawsuit in 2016 against Donald Trump. A woman alleged that Trump raped her when she was 13, claiming that he forced her “to engage in various perverted and depraved sex acts,” which were then described in more detail than seemed necessary.
A week before the election, her lawyer Lisa Bloom (with great fanfare) announced that the plaintiff would come forward publicly, only to cancel at the last minute, citing fears for her client's safety.
Who knows if the allegations were legitimate? Just as we don't know if Julie Swetnick was telling the truth—but both made charges that were so eye-popping and unsubstantiated that for some, it made it harder to believe the other, less dramatic accusations. It all just seemed like a smear.
And that is a great pity.
The Hill in a post-mortem list of winners (Mitch McConnell, Senate Republicans, President Trump) and losers in the fight ended with the biggest loser of all: America.
No wonder. This fight was stomach-churning and angry and sad, and it's left the high court further politicized.
When Kavanaugh was sworn in after the vote in a private ceremony by Chief Justice John Roberts and retired Justice Anthony Kennedy, he took an oath: To “administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich … and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me.”
For the sake of our country and the rule of law upon which it rests, may he honor it fully and faithfully.
Read more:
Brett Kavanaugh, Neutrality Questioned, Ascends to Supreme Court Kavanaugh Breaks Ground for Future Campaigning by Supreme Court Nominees Kavanaugh Didn't Help Dispel Image of Justices as 'Junior Varsity Politicians'
We hope you enjoyed this excerpt from Litigation Daily, the exclusive source for sharp commentary on mega court battles, winning strategies and the issues that obsess elite litigators. Click here to subscribe.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLess Is More: The Risks of Excessive Data Collection from Mobile Devices
6 minute readHow My Postpartum Depression Led to Launching My Firm’s Parental Leave Coaching Program
9 minute readProtecting Attorney-Client Privilege in the Modern Age of Communications
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Bar Report — Dec. 2, 2024
- 2The Impact of Erlinger on Predicate Felony Sentencing Statutes
- 3To Ease Partner Pay Tensions, Some Law Firms Are Seeking 'Middle Ground' in Transparency
- 4How Legal Aid and Tech Collaboration Can Bridge the Justice Gap
- 5The Rise of AI-Generated Deepfakes: A New Cybersecurity Threat for Law Firms
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250