Becca Heller's Journey From Yale Law Student to MacArthur 'Genius'
The 2010 law grad never imagined the refugees resettlement project she started with some Yale Law School classmates a decade ago would morph into a major player in refugee rights and land her a coveted MacArthur Fellowship.
October 10, 2018 at 12:07 PM
4 minute read
Becca Heller was a student at Yale Law School in 2008 when she and some classmates decided to help Iraqi refugees resettle in the United States and other western countries. From that informal student project grew the International Refugee Assistance Project (IRAP), a leading refugee rights organization that leverages law schools and volunteer law firms to help displaced people resettle. The group was on the front lines pushing against President Donald Trump's travel ban in 2017.
The efforts of Heller, IRAP's director, have not gone unnoticed. Last week she was named one of 25 MacArthur fellows. Recipients of the so-called MacArthur genius grants receive $625,000. Law.com spoke with Heller about winning the prize, the challenges IRAP faces in today's political climate, and how law students can pursue their passions to make a difference. Her answers have been edited for length and clarity.
Congratulations. What was your reaction when you heard you were selected for the MacArthur Fellowship?
Lots of crying. Amazed, happy tears.
How does the process work? Did you know you were in the running?
No, you don't know. Everything is totally secret. You get nominated in secret and you get considered in secret. You know nothing about it until you receive a phone call one day telling you you got it. I definitely knew the MacArthur existed. I knew people who had gotten it, so it was on my radar in that sense, but I wasn't like, “Oh, I might get a MacArthur.”
Did you ever imagine your student project would become a major player in the refugee rights arena?
Not at all. We didn't even think we were starting our own organization. We just wanted to try and help Iraqi refugees. Even in the first few years of doing IRAP, I didn't have a long-term vision of what we were doing. I didn't know how to fundraise. I didn't know how to run an organization. We were just trying to help as many people as we could. Over time, we realized there was this huge need, and no organization was really out there filling that need. So we took a stab at trying to meet that need.
What's the single biggest challenge IRAP faces right now?
Definitely geopolitics. The world has, unfortunately, turned against refugees. I think refugees have been politicized by xenophobic governments, both in America and across Europe. The impact on the willingness of the global north to assist refugees either though aid, resettlement or other means has really been hindered. Trying to find what people call “durable solutions” is incredibly challenging right now. The problem of refugees is something that a lot of resource-rich countries don't want to concern themselves with right now. I think for largely political reasons, because refugees and migrants are convenient scapegoats for failing economics, or a lack of job growth. That's very difficult to contend with.
What will you spend the $625,000 prize money on?
Really boring things. I have a kid, and my husband also works in public interest law. So child care, mortgage payments. Law school student debt. I just feel like I'm already pursuing my goals at IRAP. I hope I can leverage the attention of the prize into the growth of IRAP as much as possible. This is my goal. I don't want to leave and write a book. I don't want to go and start something new. I want to keep doing this.
What advice do you have for law students who are passionate about an issue and want to make a difference?
Just do it. Don't let anyone stop you. Jump in and do it. You have no idea what you're capable of until you try. I never would have thought I could do this. It's still absurd to me that this is what I'm doing. And the recognition is absurd. But I love it. I feel like we've been able to help a ton of people and if I hadn't been crazy enough to think I could do something about it, then nothing would have happened. You just have to jump. You'll learn as you go. Find smart people and ask for their advice all the time. Know when to be patient and when to be impatient. And thank everyone for everything.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawsuit Against Major Food Brands Could Be Sign of Emerging Litigation Over Processed Foods
3 minute readGovernment Attorneys Face Reassignment, Rescinded Job Offers in First Days of Trump Administration
4 minute readLaw Firm Sued for $35 Million Over Alleged Role in Acquisition Deal Collapse
3 minute read4th Circuit Upholds Virginia Law Restricting Online Court Records Access
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250