Becca Heller's Journey From Yale Law Student to MacArthur 'Genius'
The 2010 law grad never imagined the refugees resettlement project she started with some Yale Law School classmates a decade ago would morph into a major player in refugee rights and land her a coveted MacArthur Fellowship.
October 10, 2018 at 12:07 PM
4 minute read
Becca Heller was a student at Yale Law School in 2008 when she and some classmates decided to help Iraqi refugees resettle in the United States and other western countries. From that informal student project grew the International Refugee Assistance Project (IRAP), a leading refugee rights organization that leverages law schools and volunteer law firms to help displaced people resettle. The group was on the front lines pushing against President Donald Trump's travel ban in 2017.
The efforts of Heller, IRAP's director, have not gone unnoticed. Last week she was named one of 25 MacArthur fellows. Recipients of the so-called MacArthur genius grants receive $625,000. Law.com spoke with Heller about winning the prize, the challenges IRAP faces in today's political climate, and how law students can pursue their passions to make a difference. Her answers have been edited for length and clarity.
Congratulations. What was your reaction when you heard you were selected for the MacArthur Fellowship?
Lots of crying. Amazed, happy tears.
How does the process work? Did you know you were in the running?
No, you don't know. Everything is totally secret. You get nominated in secret and you get considered in secret. You know nothing about it until you receive a phone call one day telling you you got it. I definitely knew the MacArthur existed. I knew people who had gotten it, so it was on my radar in that sense, but I wasn't like, “Oh, I might get a MacArthur.”
Did you ever imagine your student project would become a major player in the refugee rights arena?
Not at all. We didn't even think we were starting our own organization. We just wanted to try and help Iraqi refugees. Even in the first few years of doing IRAP, I didn't have a long-term vision of what we were doing. I didn't know how to fundraise. I didn't know how to run an organization. We were just trying to help as many people as we could. Over time, we realized there was this huge need, and no organization was really out there filling that need. So we took a stab at trying to meet that need.
What's the single biggest challenge IRAP faces right now?
Definitely geopolitics. The world has, unfortunately, turned against refugees. I think refugees have been politicized by xenophobic governments, both in America and across Europe. The impact on the willingness of the global north to assist refugees either though aid, resettlement or other means has really been hindered. Trying to find what people call “durable solutions” is incredibly challenging right now. The problem of refugees is something that a lot of resource-rich countries don't want to concern themselves with right now. I think for largely political reasons, because refugees and migrants are convenient scapegoats for failing economics, or a lack of job growth. That's very difficult to contend with.
What will you spend the $625,000 prize money on?
Really boring things. I have a kid, and my husband also works in public interest law. So child care, mortgage payments. Law school student debt. I just feel like I'm already pursuing my goals at IRAP. I hope I can leverage the attention of the prize into the growth of IRAP as much as possible. This is my goal. I don't want to leave and write a book. I don't want to go and start something new. I want to keep doing this.
What advice do you have for law students who are passionate about an issue and want to make a difference?
Just do it. Don't let anyone stop you. Jump in and do it. You have no idea what you're capable of until you try. I never would have thought I could do this. It's still absurd to me that this is what I'm doing. And the recognition is absurd. But I love it. I feel like we've been able to help a ton of people and if I hadn't been crazy enough to think I could do something about it, then nothing would have happened. You just have to jump. You'll learn as you go. Find smart people and ask for their advice all the time. Know when to be patient and when to be impatient. And thank everyone for everything.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUvalde Shooting 'Fresh in Everyone's Mind:' Lone Dissenting Judge Disagrees with School's Disciplinary Decision Over Pellet Gun
Paul Weiss, Trailblazer for US Firms in China, to Close Beijing Office
3 minute readNew University of Chicago Law Course Digs Deeper Into Using Gen AI Responsibly
Trending Stories
- 1Lawyer as Litigant as Late Fees Take Spotlight in Class Action
- 2Burns White Names Conshohocken Litigator as New CEO
- 3Mattel Sued Over 'Wicked' Dolls With Pornographic Website
- 4Brown Rudnick’s Brand and Reputation Group Unfazed After Loss of 6 Prominent Partners and Their Big-Name Clients
- 5Fulton Judge Weighs Whether to Order Fani Willis to Comply With Lawmakers' Subpoenas Over Trump Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250