Boies Schiller in Spat With Billionaire Over Unpaid Legal Fees
Boies Schiller Flexner withdrew from representing billionaire Alex Shnaider in September, citing irreconcilable differences and unpaid legal bills. Now Shnaider's arguing that the firm is improperly withholding a case file he needs for an upcoming trial.
October 11, 2018 at 05:56 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
|
A New York state court is expected to rule Friday on Russian-Canadian billionaire Alex Shnaider's attempt to obtain a client file from Boies Schiller Flexner, which previously represented Shnaider in contract litigation and has asserted a retaining lien over the file because its former client owes the firm legal fees.
Shnaider, now represented by Michael Bowen of Kasowitz Benson Torres, filed a petition on Wednesday, asking a Manhattan state court judge to issue an immediate injunction that would require Boies Schiller to provide a copy of Shnaider's file in a separate lawsuit that has a trial scheduled to begin in December. New York Supreme Court Justice Debra James is expected to hold a hearing on the petition Friday morning.
Kasowitz also represents Shnaider in the underlying contract case, in which the billionaire was accused in Manhattan federal court of breaching agreements with former business partner Eduard Slinin, according to court records in that suit.
Shnaider and Slinin, who bonded over their shared roots as Jewish emigrants from the former Soviet Union, teamed up, starting in the mid-2000s, on a plan to buy several private jets from Bombardier Inc. The idea was to use Shnaider's business connections to buy Learjets and other planes, and then “flip” them for a profit by selling the aircraft to Slinin's contacts, many of whom were Russian or Ukrainian businesspeople, according to court records. The business partnership later soured, however, and Slinin sued in 2015.
(Separate from the jet case, Shnaider's reported links to Russia have landed him in the news recently, specifically related to his past business partnership with President Donald Trump, whose company licensed the Trump brand for use on a skyscraper that Shnaider developed in Toronto.)
In early September, U.S. District Judge Richard Sullivan, who is overseeing the jet case, granted the firm's motion to withdraw from representing Shnaider. The ruling came just days after Boies Schiller's Karen Dyer sent a letter asking to withdraw as defense counsel “due to irreconcilable differences with Mr. Shnaider regarding the payment of BSF's legal fees.”
Before that, Boies Schiller served as Shnaider's defense counsel in the jet case from February 2016 until the representation ended in early September. During their time representing him, the firm helped Shnaider narrow the case, convincing Sullivan to dismiss claims for breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment. That left Slinin with a single claim for an accounting on dissolution of his partnership with Shnaider.
In the state court petition, Shnaider alleges that Boies Schiller asserted a retaining lien on his case file in the jet case because of the dispute over unpaid legal fees. Regardless of who's right in the legal fee dispute, Shnaider argued, Boies Schiller should still have to provide at least the portion of the client file that contains discovery related to the jet case, in light of the upcoming trial.
“Irrespective of the merits of any claim BSF may have to unpaid legal fees, withholding discovery on the eve of trial will grievously harm BSF's own former client,” Shnaider's lawyers at Kasowitz wrote in the state court petition.
As of Thursday afternoon, Boies Schiller hadn't submitted any state court filings in response to Shnaider's petition, and representatives for the firm declined to comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
2 minute readFinancial Watchdog Alleges Walmart Forced Army of Gig-Worker Drivers to Receive Pay Through High-Fee Accounts
Trending Stories
- 1Top Five Florida Verdicts of 2024
- 2The Evolution of a Virtual Court System
- 3New Acquitted Conduct Guideline: An Analysis
- 4Considering the Implications of the 2024 Presidential Election for Jurors in White Collar Cases
- 52024 in Review: Judges Met Out Punishments for Ex-Apple, FDIC, Moody's Legal Leaders
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250