Boies Schiller Partner Tapped as Special Prosecutor in Arpaio Appeal
Christopher Caldwell has been called on by a Ninth Circuit panel to argue for upholding the contempt of court finding against the former Maricopa County sheriff after the Department of Justice has indicated that it supports vacating Arpaio's conviction.
October 15, 2018 at 07:34 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has tapped Boies Schiller Flexner partner Christopher Caldwell as a special prosecutor to defend the contempt of court conviction of former Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio.
Caldwell was a founding partner in Los Angeles-based litigation boutique Caldwell Leslie & Proctor, which was absorbed by Boies Schiller last year. According to his firm bio, Caldwell served as a trial lawyer in the public integrity section of the Department of Justice's Criminal Division in the mid-1980s before moving into private practice where he focuses on cases involving the entertainment industry, intellectual property, securities, employment, professional liability, and white-collar crimes. Caldwell didn't immediately respond to an email seeking comment.
A deeply divided Ninth Circuit last week signed off on an earlier panel decision appointing a special prosecutor in the case. After President Donald Trump pardoned Arpaio last year, U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton of the District of Arizona dismissed the government's case at his lawyers' request, but declined to vacate the court record in the case, finding the president's pardon “does not erase a judgment of conviction, or its underlying legal and factual findings.”
When Arpaio's lawyers appealed that ruling, Department of Justice lawyers agreed with the defense that Bolton below should have erased Arpaio's criminal contempt verdict. Two members of a divided Ninth Circuit motions panel—Circuit Judges A. Wallace Tashima and William Fletcher—in April found that they had the authority to appoint a special prosecutor under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 42. In dissent, Judge Richard Tallman wrote that the move was “ill-advised and unnecessary.”
Tallman on Monday concurred with an order from Tashima and Fletcher appointing Caldwell but still noted that he thought the correct course of action would be to appoint amicus curiae to defend the district court's ruling on the vacatur issue. “Having failed to persuade my colleagues, however, I respect the court's decision and therefore regrettably must concur in the form of the order appointing special prosecutor Caldwell,” he wrote.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Nuclear Option'?: Eli Lilly Taps Big Law Firms in Federal Drug Pricing Dispute
3 minute read'Health Care Behemoth'?: DOJ Seeks Injunction Blocking $3.3B UnitedHealth Merger Proposal
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250