Insurance Giant Hit With Class Action Alleging Underpayment for Mental Health Visits
United HealthCare Insurance Co. is accused of imposing arbitrary reimbursement penalties for psychotherapy provided by psychologists and master's-level counselors rather than doctors.
October 17, 2018 at 06:35 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
Affiliates of UnitedHealth Group Inc., the nation's largest health insurer, were hit with a class action lawsuit Tuesday claiming they are illegally underpaying reimbursements for mental health services.
According to the complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, United HealthCare Insurance Co. (UHIC) and United Behavioral Health imposed arbitrary reimbursement penalties for certain psychotherapy services provided by psychologists and master's-level counselors rather than doctors.
The plaintiff, a Pennsylvania woman asking to proceed anonymously because of the “pervasive stigma” of mental illness, claimed UnitedHealth reduced the “eligible expense” of covered charges from her master's-level counselor by 35 percent, rather than no reduction at all for identical services should she have received the same treatment from a physician.
The Jane Smith plaintiff claimed that difference violates provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, which prohibit discrimination with respect to mental health and substance use disorder benefits and the Affordable Care Act, which prohibits discrimination in coverage against psychologists and master's-level counselors when they act within the scope of their licenses under applicable state law.
The suit, filed by lawyers at Zuckerman Spaeder and Psych-Appeal, Inc., a Los Angeles-based law firm exclusively dedicated to mental health insurance claims, also claimed that UnitedHealthcare breached its fiduciary duty to patients.
“United sacrificed the interests of insureds so that it could artificially decrease the amount of benefits it was required to pay from its own assets (i.e., with respect to fully insured plans) and the assets of its employer-sponsor customers (i.e., with respect to self-funded plans),” the lawyers wrote. “Moreover, by prioritizing the assets of its employer-sponsored customers over the interests of participants and beneficiaries, United also advanced its own interests in retaining and expanding its business with such customers.”
Plaintiffs are seeking to certify a class of “thousands of subscribers” nationwide to seek reprocessing of all wrongfully reduced claims and an injunction barring the differing reimbursement practices going forward.
A spokeswoman for UnitedHealthcare didn't immediately provide comment on the suit when contacted Wednesday.
Read the complaint:
Correction: An earlier version of this story mistakenly stated that the plaintiff's insurance claim would have been reduced 25 percent should she have received the same treatment from a physician. In fact, she claims there would have been no reduction should she have been treated by a physician.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDefendant Awarded Increased Attorney Fees Six Months After Trial Win Against FTC
'Nothing Is Good for the Consumer Right Now': Experts Weigh Benefits, Drawbacks of Updated Real Estate Commission Policies
Temu Sued by SHEIN for Copyright Infringement, Separate Data Privacy Class Actions Continue in New York
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250