LSAT Prep Course Bolsters Brain Function, Berkeley Researchers Find
Taking a prep course heightens a person's reasoning abilities, even on tasks completely unrelated to the law school entrance exam, according to new research.
October 19, 2018 at 02:20 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
Want to train your brain to synthesize information and reach conclusions quickly? Try an LSAT prep course.
Researchers from the University of California, Berkeley have spent the past five years using the Law School Admissions Test to study the brain and how people learn. Their research found that taking an LSAT prep course—specifically focusing on the logic games section—bolsters subjects' ability to reason in areas unrelated to the exam.
Put another way, the benefits of studying for the LSAT go beyond the test itself: The test prep process actually bolsters the structure and function of the brain. Further research concluded that the eye movements of LSAT takers completing reasoning tasks provides more information about their learning and decision-making process than does neuroimaging technology such as MRIs. Their most recent study was published Thursday in Science of Learning, a Nature Partner Journal.
Berkeley neuroscience professor Silvia Bunge said that when she became interested in looking at whether you can train the brain in reasoning skills, she considered all the standardized admission tests as possible subjects. But the LSAT stood apart for its focus on reasoning skills. (Analytical and logical reasoning comprise two of the LSAT's three sections. Reading comprehension is the third.)
“We decided that was the one that most heavily emphasized reasoning,” said Bunge, who co-authored the most recent study.
In the initial phase of their research, the Berkeley team looked for differences in the reasoning abilities of those who completed Blueprint Test Preparation's LSAT course and those who took no prep course. The subjects who took the prep course were faster to complete a visual reasoning task wholly unrelated to the LSAT's text-based questions. Brain scans of the test subjects also found that studying for the LSAT for three months bolstered the connections between the right and left sides of the brain.
“We showed that the benefits of studying for the LSAT go beyond the LSAT itself,” Bunge said. “But we didn't feel like we had a good handle on how, exactly, people are improving their reasoning.”
For the second phase of their study, the Berkeley researchers tracked the eye movements of those who completed a 33-hour online Kaplan Test Prep LSAT course. They concluded that eye movements—such as rapid movements or fixed gazes—actually reveal more about the learning and decision-making process than do brain scans. One group studied only for the logic games section, while the other studied only for the reading comprehension section. When faced with a visually based reasoning task, the logic games group was able to encode and integrate information faster than the reading comprehension group, their eye movements showed.
“One possibility is that people, after training, get faster at identifying the relevant pieces of information,” Bunge said. “The other thing is that it would take them less time to extract the necessary information to make their inference.”
But prepping for the LSAT is no guarantee of a lifetime of heightened reasoning skills.
“We're not saying these changes are forever,” Bunge said. “Our brain is constantly changing as a function of what we're experiencing over time. If you practice for the LSAT and spend the next year just watching TV, it's not going to be the case that you have sharpened reasoning skills.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Right Amount?: Federal Judge Weighs $1.8M Attorney Fee Request with Strip Club's $15K Award
Kline & Specter and Bosworth Resolve Post-Settlement Fighting Ahead of Courtroom Showdown
6 minute read12-Partner Team 'Surprises' Atlanta Firm’s Leaders With Exit to Launch New Reed Smith Office
4 minute readMorgan Lewis Shutters Shenzhen Office Less Than Two Years After Launch
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250