Michael Avenatti Ordered to Pay $4.85M to Former Contract Attorney
Avenatti, the lawyer who sued President Donald Trump on behalf of porn star Stormy Daniels, was ordered to pay a former contract attorney at his firm.
October 22, 2018 at 05:56 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
Michael Avenatti, attorney for Stormy Daniels, speaks to the press at the Daniel P. Moynihan Courthouse in New York City. (Photo: David Handschuh/ALM)
A Los Angeles judge has ordered Michael Avenatti, the lawyer who sued President Donald Trump on behalf of porn star Stormy Daniels, to pay $4.85 million to a former contract attorney at his firm, according to the lawyer who brought the case.
The contract attorney, Jason Frank, resigned from Avenatti's former firm in 2016 after claiming he was owed millions of dollars in unpaid compensation, according to court records. The judge's order came from the bench at a hearing on Monday, noted Frank's lawyer, Eric George of Los Angeles-based Browne George Ross.
“If he doesn't pay this right away, this is a debt that will follow him for years, if not decades,” George said of Avenatti. “There's no evading this.”
Avenatti, a solo practitioner in Newport Beach, California, confirmed the judgment but insisted that Frank owes him $12 million.
George countered by stating not only that Avenatti has “never brought any such claim against Jason Frank, he never could bring any such claim because he released all claims against Jason Frank as part of his bankruptcy court settlement.”
According to court documents, that settlement was between Avenatti's former law firm, Eagan Avenatti, and Frank and his current partners at Irvine, California's Frank Sims & Stolper. Under the settlement, reached as part of Eagan Avenatti's Chapter 11 bankruptcy in Santa Ana, California, Avenatti's former firm was supposed to pay $10 million. But Frank's firm agreed to $4.85 million under a specific timeline of installments.
After Avenatti's former firm didn't pay up, Jason Frank Law PLC brought a motion for judgment. On May 22, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Catherine Bauer entered a $10 million judgment against Eagan Avenatti in favor of Jason Frank Law, represented by Perkins Coie in the bankruptcy case.
Monday's award came in a separate case that Jason Frank Law brought for breach of guaranty against Avenatti personally.
“To the extent that Mr. Avenatti's law firm personally generates income, my client will be entitled to that,” George said. “To the extent Mr. Avenatti personally comes across any income, my client will been entitled to that, as well.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Clifford Chance Further Modifies Lockstep to Better Reward Top Performers
2 minute read
Microsoft's Banner Year Pushed Brad Smith's Pay Sharply Higher
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
