O'Connor, Stepping Back From Public Life, Gave Her Chambers to Kennedy
With Justice Samuel Alito Jr. moving up to Anthony Kennedy's chambers, Brett Kavanaugh took Alito's. But where would Kennedy go?
October 23, 2018 at 12:30 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Before announcing her withdrawal from public life on Tuesday, retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor gave her newly retired colleague Anthony Kennedy a gift of sorts: her chambers. It was a gesture that affirmed the camaraderie and traditions that keep the court collegial, most of the time.
When Kennedy officially retired on July 31, he left behind one of the most coveted offices or chambers of the court, with a stunning view of the U.S. Capitol across the street. Its location enabled him to watch protesters outside, once leading him to utter this memorable if cryptic statement as abortion rights activists demonstrated in 1992: “Sometimes you don't know if you're Caesar about to cross the Rubicon or Captain Queeg cutting your own tow line.”
Once a justice cuts his or her own ties by retirement, the new justice replacing the retiree does not automatically inherit the predecessor's quarters.
The vacated chamber is offered up to sitting justices, in order of seniority. Justice Samuel Alito Jr. now occupies Kennedy's chambers, which likely means that three associate justices with more seniority than Alito—Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer—said no thanks, for reasons that can only be guessed at.
With Alito moving up to Kennedy's chambers, Brett Kavanaugh took Alito's. But where would Kennedy go? Retired justices are entitled to an office, though sometimes a smaller one; they have only one law clerk instead of the four clerks allotted to sitting justices.
O'Connor came to the rescue, turning over her retiree chambers to Kennedy, the court public information office reported on Monday. The court's first female justice had moved to different quarters after she retired in 2006 and Alito, her successor, moved in to her former chambers, completing the circle.
O'Connor's move was a melancholy sign of her health issues at age 88. But in a way, it also symbolized the devotion justices have to their colleagues in retirement, even after decades of working together.
The Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building is a few blocks away from the Supreme Court, and when it opened in 1992, two or three offices were allotted for retired Supreme Court justices, on the theory that there might not be enough space for retirees at the court itself.
But that option was never popular, and the last retired justice with an office at the Marshall building was Byron White, who died in 2002. Justices simply did not want to leave the welcoming surroundings of the Supreme Court community.
The Supreme Court now has four living retired justices, an unusually large number. Retired Justice John Paul Stevens still has chambers at the Supreme Court as does David Souter, who also has an office in his home state of New Hampshire.
Now Kennedy has chambers at the Supreme Court too, instead of at a nearby building, thanks to O'Connor. She had turned down an office at the Marshall building herself in 2006. At the time, she said she didn't want to be “out of the loop like Byron.”
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Judge Rejects Morgan Stanley Reconsideration Bid in Deferred Compensation Litigation
Transgender Woman Awarded $150K Default Judgment Against Corrections Officer for Alleged Assault
Legal Speak: A Convicted Felon is Coming to the White House. What Happens Now?
1 minute readAT&T General Counsel Joins ADM Board as Company Reels From Accounting Scandal
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250