Critical Mass: Judge Rounds Down the RoundUp Verdict. Plus: First Circuit Excludes Uninjured Claimants From Class
A San Francisco judge slashed a $289 million Roundup verdict, but her decision left plaintiffs' lawyers cheering as it accepted punitive damages as justified.
October 24, 2018 at 12:32 PM
4 minute read
Welcome to Critical Mass, Law.com's weekly briefing on class actions and mass torts. This week, a judge slashed a $289 million Roundup verdict, but it is plaintiffs' lawyers who are cheering. Also, the 1st Circuit came out with a key ruling about uninjured class members. And find out who stands to get $35 million in legal fees from Yahoo's data breach settlement.
Send your feedback to [email protected], or find me on Twitter: @abronstadlaw.
Roundup Gets Rounded Down
A San Francisco judge slashed the $289 million Roundup verdict against Monsanto to about $78.5 million—and plaintiffs lawyers are rejoicing!
As Ross Todd reports for Law.com, San Francisco Superior Court Judge Suzanne Bolanos found the $250 million in punitive damages to be unconstitutionally high. But she didn't think it was unjustified, despite a tentative ruling she issued two weeks earlier to toss the entire punitive damages award. Instead, she capped punitives at $39.25 million—the amount of compensatory damages.
Ross told me:
“The judge lowered it after finding the jury's punitive number didn't pass muster under the 14th Amendment. She found that $37 million of the compensatory damages were non-economic—a 'substantial' amount. 'In a case such as this where there is a punitive element to the compensatory damages award, the law supports only a one-to-one ratio for punitive damages,' the judge wrote.” But it was bad news for Monsanto. Its parent corporation, Bayer, vowed to appeal. Bloomberg reported that Bayer's shares plummeted after news of the ruling, and had more on the judge's remarkable turnaround from her tentative order, which looked to be going Monsanto's way.
There are six Roundup trials coming up in 2019. Plaintiffs attorney Aimee Wagstaff (Andrus Wagstaff) told me: “Our trial teams are picking up steam, and we are ready.”
First Circuit Weighs in on Uninjured Class Members
The defense bar is raving about a ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit that decertified a class in which an estimated 10 percent of the class members were uninjured. Circuit Judge William Kayatta, who dissented from the In re Nexium Antitrust Litig. decision in 2015, authored the Oct. 15 opinion in an antitrust class action over anti-inflammatory prescription drug Asacol.
In re Nexium upheld a certification order, finding that the defendant, if it wanted to, could identify such a “de minimis number of uninjured members” through the use of affidavits. But in the Asacol case, Kayatta said the defendant, Allergan, was looking at actually contesting what could end up being potentially thousands of affidavits.
Wystan Ackerman (Robinson + Cole) wrote on his blog, Class Actions Insider:
“This opinion thoroughly addresses an important issue that is present in many consumer class action suits. I expect it will be cited and likely followed by other circuits.”
Who Got the Work?
Yahoo has agreed to pay $85 million to settle consumer class actionsbrought over its recent data breaches, and plaintiffs lawyers are expected to get up to $35 million in attorney fees. So who were the lead lawyers behind the settlement? John Yanchunis (Morgan & Morgan) was lead settlement class counsel. Executive settlement class counsel were Ariana Tadler (Milberg Tadler), Stuart Davidson (Robbins Geller), Gayle Blatt (Casey Gerry), and Karen Riebel (Lockridge Grindal). Daniel Robinson (Robinson Calcagnie) also was involved.
Here's Some More News:
Trojan Truce: USC has agreed to pay $240 million to settle class actions brought in federal court alleging its former campus gynecologist sexually abused students. The settlement resolves claims of potentially tens of thousands of women who saw Dr. George Tyndall, the university's gynecologist for more than two decades. Claimants will be awarded based on three tiers of injuries under the settlement, which includes $25 million in attorney fees.
Post-Mortem Appeal: The law firm of the late John O'Quinn lost its bid before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to force its excess insurance carrier to fork over $10 million. The dispute stems from a $46.5 million settlement that the Houston personal injury lawyer reached with his former breast implant clients relating to litigation overcharges. O'Quinn's firm sought to recover $15 million of the payout from his insurance companies. The primary carrier agreed to pay $5 million, but the excess insurer, Lexington Insurance, refused to pay the remaining $10 million.
Tracking Target: Facebook was hit with yet another class action, this time alleging it tracks the locations of its users even if they change their privacy settings to prevent it. The lawsuit mirrors a class action brought against Google. Tycko & Zavareei and Stueve Siegel Hanson filed the Facebook case in California.
Thanks for reading Critical Mass! See you next week!
Would you like to receive Inside Track as an email? Sign up here.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250