You Failed the Bar Exam. Now What?
With bar pass rates in the dumps nationwide, two academic support deans offer their advice to those who failed on how to absorb the bad news and pass on the next try.
October 24, 2018 at 02:16 PM
6 minute read
Bar exam results are coming in across the country, and they aren't pretty.
The national average score on the Multistate Bar Exam for July sank to a 34-year low. New York's pass rate dropped five percentage points to a dismal 63 percent. The pass rate in Pennsylvania ticked down from 81 percent to 79 percent. Florida didn't fare any better, seeing its pass rate drop to 67 percent from 71 percent the previous year. All of this means that a lot of law graduates are facing the prospect of retaking the bar.
We reached out to Allie Robbins, assistant dean for academic affairs at the City University of New York School of Law, and Amy Jarmon, assistant dean for academic success programs at Texas Tech University School of Law, for their advice on how to digest the bad news and plan for taking the exam again. Here's what they said.
1. Process the News
Finding out you failed the bar exam can be a shock to the system and a major blow to one's self-esteem. Take a few days to grieve the failure, but keep it in perspective. “You're going to be upset, you're going to be angry,” Robbins said. “It's OK to feel that for a couple of days. But failing the bar doesn't mean anything about how you're going to be as an attorney—that you're still going to be a fabulous attorney. You need to move past it after a few days and turn it into action.” Those who have failed the bar often feel embarrassed that their classmates will find out, or guilty that they have let down their families, Jarmon said. “Part of it is getting beyond the emotions of it, grieving the fact that you didn't pass, and then moving on and reaching out,” she said.
2. Talk to Your Employer
Studying for the bar exam a second time around is especially tricky for law graduates who are already working. Many can't afford to step away from their jobs in order to focus solely on studying, so it's important to discuss the situation with your work supervisor and develop a plan for taking time off or reducing your work hours as the exam approaches. Robbins suggests taking time off work in the days right before the exam. And retakers should aim to study for two hours a day and all day on weekends.
3. Reach Out to Your Law School
Just because you've graduated doesn't mean you can't make use of your law school's bar exam resources. In fact, law schools want you to stay in touch and continue to use their academic support and bar exam help. Jarmon said Texas Tech's bar support staff helps retakers figure out what went wrong on the exam, develop a game plan for studying again, and keeps them accountable for following that plan. They also offer much-needed encouragement. “Here at CUNY Law, we have a mentor program that we run for every bar exam,” Robbins said. “We allow retakers to be part of it, so they are paired up with one of our faculty or alums. They get to do essays together and [Multistate Performance Tests] together and talk about the process. I know academic and bar support folks around the country do that.”
4. Pinpoint What Went Wrong
Did anxiety or panic attacks derail you on the bar? Did you not study enough? Identifying the root causes of your failure will help you develop a more effective plan of attack for retaking the bar exam, Jarmon said. If anxiety was a factor, seeking out counseling may be the most effective course of action. If you simply didn't put in enough study time or complete enough of your bar prep course, committing to more study could make the difference, she said. Robbins suggests that bar failers get their written work back, if they're in jurisdictions that allow it. Comparing their essays to the model answers is a great way to identify problems. “It can help you pinpoint places you need to improve, whether it's structural, issue spotting, or rule memorization,” she said.
5. Develop a Study Plan, and Stick to It
Jarmon suggests test takers carve out specific times to study, and don't just count on grabbing study time here and there. Most bar prep courses will allow bar failers free access to study materials if they already paid for the course. But Robbins counsels students not to rewatch all the lectures. Instead, she and Jarmon emphasize taking as many practice exams as possible. “The more practice questions you do, the more likely you are to become a good test taker for the format,” Jarmon said. “You also find out what areas you need some extra study in.” Robbins tells students to ease back into studying with subjects they are already comfortable with, rather than jumping right in on those that they struggled with on the first bar.
6. Fight the Urge to Isolate Yourself
“I've had students who isolate themselves and don't want to talk to anyone about it,” Robbins said. “But they usually have worse outcomes than those who engage. Bar exam study is isolating enough, and it's better to reach out for support as you're doing this again.” Every year CUNY Law holds a bar retaker lunch or dinner, bringing back graduates who passed the exam on their second try to speak with those who recently failed the exam. The event helps attendees to put their failure in perspective and understand that the test is not an indication of their potential as attorneys.
7. Believe in Yourself
It's easy to become overwhelmed with self-doubt after failing the bar exam, but those negative feelings can derail your efforts to pass the second time, according to Jarmon. “A lot of time, failing the first time becomes a psychological barrier that folks have trouble getting past,” she said. “A lot of passing the bar—in addition to putting in the hours and being effective and efficient in how you study—is just believing in yourself. It's easy to feel like, 'Maybe I'm too dumb to do this.' They have to put the failure behind them and say, 'here are things I can do differently to help me pass the next time.'”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllContract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250