A Niche Focus Makes Midsize Firms Indispensable to Clients
From counseling craft breweries to conducting complex investigations, these midsize firms aim to compete by doing what no one else does.
October 25, 2018 at 01:49 PM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Pro Mid-Market
Eugene Pak was handling intellectual property and transactional work at DLA Piper eight or nine years ago when he found his niche. While representing a Northern California brewery in a dispute, he quickly grew fond of the craft beer industry—the beer itself was pretty good, too—so when his client suggested he focus more attention on the burgeoning market, he hopped in.
For Pak, shifting to a newly specialized practice meant finding a new firm, one that offered the right platform for someone catering to startup and small breweries with major needs and minimal funds. He followed a friend to 65-lawyer, Oakland, California-based Wendel Rosen Black & Dean, a firm with billing rates that suited his new clients, as well as attorneys who could help them with all their legal needs—IP, corporate, real estate or anything else.
“It was a little bit of a struggle to say I'm going to focus on this one industry and put most of my eggs in one basket,” Pak said, “but I found that that is what you have to do to stand out.”
And in many cases, a midsize firm is the best place to do that. For attorneys and firms, niche practices offer a way to differentiate from the competition and bring in business at the same time.
In the late 1980s, 203-lawyer Greenspoon Marder got in on the ground floor of a new industry and carved out what can only be described as a niche: a timeshare and resort practice. At the time, there were hardly any regulations governing timeshares, according to Rebecca Bratter, the firm's deputy managing partner, and Greenspoon Marder's attorneys helped to create the laws.
As the industry grew, so did the firm. Its clients needed advice on land use, real estate, creating corporate structures, labor and employment and, as can be expected in any growing market, litigation.
“This was a brand new practice and Greenspoon Marder really helped that industry grow, and the industry helped the firm grow,” Bratter said. “Our entire regulatory practice grew out of the timeshare industry.”
Practices like the firm's timeshare work—or its separate focuses on entertainment, alcohol and beverage, and now cannabis—can help a midsize firm survive and grow, Bratter said. They've played an “integral role” as a complement to the firm's bread-and-butter corporate work. In many cases, as Greenspoon Marder found with its timeshare work, a sturdy niche can be a reliable client's gateway into a firm.
“Once you've proven through your niche practice that you can compete—that your lawyers are as good, if not better than any others—now you can bring them in to the rest of your firm,” Bratter said. “And then [clients see] the rates are more competitive, there's less bureaucracy, we're more nimble.”
As Pak pointed out, smaller firms or solo practitioners can't offer clients the same kind of “one-stop shop,” so midsize firms sit in a pocket that can help niche practices flourish.
Rob Reedy, the managing partner of Porter Hedges, said niche practices offer a clear path for midsize firms to better compete with their peers. His firm's energy practice has a particular strength in operational oil and gas and midstream work, in addition to the usual transactional work that gets most of the attention. Many of the firm's clients, he said, turn to Porter Hedges for things like gas contracts, participation agreements and joint ventures.
“These deals are nuts and bolts,” he said. “They don't end up being splashy.”
But the true value of many companies lies within such work, making it a profitable niche for the firm.
Building up a niche practice takes careful planning, though, to ensure it can deliver a return on investment.
“Something that's a specialized niche today is a commodity tomorrow,” Michael Kim of 92-lawyer Kobre & Kim said. “Nothing stands still. Some firms say they have a niche or specialized practice, but at one point patent prosecution was specialized, and now they're a commodity; at one point white-collar crime was specialized and now it's a commodity.”
Kim's firm developed what he called “a niche within a niche,” serving as conflict counsel on complex, international litigation and investigations—work that nearly no other firm can do because it typically requires the size and resources of a large, full-service firm, but those firms need to refer it out because of their reliance on repeat clients. Kim said his firm handles “way over half” of the matters that fall into its niche.
For firms seeking to target a niche, he said, it's important that there be a barrier of entry. If other firms are able to rush in and begin doing the work, it can quickly become a commodity, negating the benefits of focusing on the work in the first place. He said Kobre & Kim also maintains a culture of constant change to avoid getting caught in a not-quite-niche. As examples of the risk of inertia, he pointed to airline regulation boutiques in the 1970s that went out of business upon deregulation, and intellectual property boutiques in the 1990s that were eventually forced to merge with bigger firms.
Operating a truly successful niche practice takes a level of self-assessment, he said.
“If you have a practice that you think is niche, but it's being priced at or below prevailing market prices for generic legal services in that area, you really don't have a niche practice,” he said. “You have a narrow practice.”
Done right, though, a niche practice can make all the difference.
“If a midsize firm has a niche practice that is premium priced—the clients are willing to pay a premium for them—that firm can focus on those core specialties, and if they're disciplined can propel themselves to a higher level,” Kim said. “It can lift the firm overall in the client's eyes.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGOP Now Holds FTC Gavel, but Dems Signal They'll Be a Rowdy Minority
6 minute read'Serious Legal Errors'?: Rival League May Appeal Following Dismissal of Soccer Antitrust Case
6 minute read28 Firms Supporting Retired Barnes & Thornburg Litigator in Georgia Supreme Court Malpractice Case
7 minute readHow Some Elite Law Firms Are Growing Equity Partner Ranks Faster Than Others
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Carol-Lisa Phillips to Rise to Broward Chief Judge as Jack Tuter Weighs Next Move
- 2Data Breaches in UK Legal Sector Surge, According to ICO Data
- 3Georgia Law Schools Seeing 24% More Applicants This Year
- 4After Shutting USAID, Trump Eyes Department of Education, CFPB
- 5‘Keep Men Out’: Female Swimmers Sue Ivy Leagues Over Lia Thomas’ Sweep
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250