Lawyer Couple Shared Too Much, Prompting Disciplinary Action
Can a two-lawyer home lead to legal ethics quandaries? The answer is yes, at least in the case of a couple from Ohio.
October 25, 2018 at 04:58 PM
3 minute read
The Ohio Supreme Court has handed down stayed suspensions to two education lawyers whose disciplinary case shed light on the ethical obligations of romantically involved attorneys.
The lawyers, Ashleigh Brie Kerr and Thomas Holmes, previously admitted that they shared emails with one another that included confidential client information and work product. The two are also engaged and live together in Aurora, Ohio. In a decision handed down on Thursday, the Ohio high court ruled that the couple's email exchanges violated the state's rules of professional conduct and that each deserved a six-month, stayed suspension.
The stayed sanction means, in effect, that neither will have to stop practicing law as long as they don't run afoul of legal ethics rules again, according to the Ohio Supreme Court. The high court's finding affirms the sanction that the Ohio Board of Professional Conduct previously recommended in the case.
Holmes and Kerr both practice a similar type of law—advising public school districts—but worked at separate firms and never shared any common clients, according to Thursday's ruling. Of the two, Kerr has been admitted to the bar for a shorter amount of time. Their ethics violations took place while Holmes was a lawyer at Day Ketterer in Hudson, Ohio, and while Kerr practiced at O'Toole McLaughlin Dooley & Pecora in Sheffield Village, Ohio.
“In general, Kerr forwarded to Holmes emails from her clients requesting legal documents. In response, Holmes forwarded to Kerr emails that he had exchanged with his clients which included similar documents he had prepared for them,” the Ohio high court wrote of the conduct that led to the disciplinary action. “Holmes and Kerr stipulated that in about one-third of these email exchanges, Holmes had ultimately completed Kerr's work for her.”
A lawyer for Holmes, Jonathan Coughlan, was not immediately available for comment on Thursday, while Kerr's lawyer, George Jonson of Montgomery Rennie Jonson, didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
Previously, the lawyers representing Kerr and Holmes in the disciplinary proceeding confirmed that both had left their prior law firms. In July, Coughlan said Holmes' departure was unrelated to the disciplinary case; he left Day Ketterer alongside two other colleagues, and they were in the process of joining a new firm.
In early August, an education law-focused firm in Toledo, Ohio, Peters Kalail & Markakis, announced that Holmes had joined that firm along with former Day Ketterer partners Maria Limbert Markakis and Albin Bauer II. As of Thursday, however, Holmes was not listed on that firm's online directory, though Markakis and Bauer are. The Supreme Court Of Ohio Attorney Directory identified Holmes Legal Services as Holmes' current firm. The directory did not identify any law firm associated with Kerr.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAm Law 100 Lateral Partner Hiring Rose in 2024: Report
JCPenney Seeks Return of More Than $1.1M From Jackson Walker For Bankruptcy Work
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250