The #MeToo Backlash Is Building
One year later, with male/female workplace relationships in an awkward phase, women are feeling the fallout.
October 26, 2018 at 03:44 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Maybe it was inevitable that the #MeToo movement would come back to bite women.
On one hand, women seem more powerful than ever. It's not just mighty titans like Harvey Weinstein or Les Moonves who've fallen because of allegations of sexual harassment, but hardworking stiffs of the legal profession like former Mayer Brown partner James Tanenbaum and that mystery partner from Baker McKenzie's London office (whose identity most of us know), among others.
The fallout is that some male lawyers are so fearful of being tainted with sexual harassment charges that they're running for the hills, dodging close working relationships with women. They might not be as blatant as Mike Pence about avoiding female company (he never eats alone with a woman other than his wife, nor does he go to events that serve alcohol without her), but they're drawing a line, nonetheless.
“It's a genuine fear,” says a young female partner at an Am Law 100 firm in New York. “I've talked to men—well-meaning ones—who say they're scared of being taken the wrong way by women, who don't know how they should interact with female associates and colleagues. I'm afraid this will mean men will exclude us even more from relationship-building opportunities. If there's a case that entails travel, they might think it's safer to pick a male colleague than me.”
Women have reason to worry that they might be excluded. According to a survey by Working Mother and ABA Journal released this year, most men (56 percent) are nervous about one-on-one interactions with women at work and the charges of impropriety that might result. One male leader told the authors of the survey, “One allegation can be a career killer,” adding, “I will not be alone in the office with any female—whether she is a colleague or a support-staff member. This is to protect myself.”
That kind of attitude certainly won't help women gain high-profile assignments or critical sponsorship when men are still the ones in control. It's also an abdication of a leader's responsibility, says diversity consultant Jennifer Brown.
“If people in power are too afraid because of the headlines and the scrutiny, that's a problem,” she says. “It's their job to integrate those who are not well-represented.”
Brown suggests that the male manager ask women what would be a comfortable format for one-on-one work, instead of requiring them to set the boundaries.
“The onus shouldn't be on those who are in a marginalized position,” Brown says.
It's clear that male/female relationships at work are in an awkward phase.
“I am seeing a hypersensitivity among young women attorneys to behavior which, while not necessarily great, does not rise to the level of sexual harassment,” says career coach Ellen Ostrow.
She cites two examples: A male partner who touches the arm of a female associate for doing a great job, and a male senior counsel who compliments the blouse of a female lawyer. In both cases, the women complained.
“There's a blurring of what constitutes gender bias and what is harassment,” Ostrow says.
Many women don't buy the idea that men are in a bind.
“Some men are using it as an excuse not to sponsor or meet with women alone,” says Joan Williams, professor at University of California, Hastings College of the Law.
“It's a bunch of crap that men don't know what to do now,” says a senior female counsel at a large bank. “They're trying to be cute, like, 'Oh, women are so touchy, they'll get offended about anything.'”
Call it the #MeToo backlash or the Pence effect. Any way you look at it, it's another reason women are still stuck.
Contact Vivia Chen at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNewly Formed DEI Practices Expect Heightened Demand During Trump Administration
Overcoming Hurricane Helene: How the Western North Carolina Legal Community Managed Court Closures, Sanitation Concerns
On a Texas Growth Surge, Paul Hastings Signs New Leases in Houston, Dallas
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1$400M Case: Trustee Claims Instant Pot-Maker Defrauded Lenders
- 2NLRB Bans 'Captive Audience' Meetings, Yanking Away Platform Employers Used to Combat Unionizing Efforts
- 3The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies
- 4Bosworth Claims It Was Kline & Specter, Not Him, That Breached Settlement Terms
- 5K&L Gates Faces Malpractice Suit: 'An Experienced Labor Attorney Would Know'
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250