GC Pay Is Up for Many but More in Some Sectors Than Others: Survey
While most GCs have been getting raises, the money varied based on the size of the company and the industry in which it operates.
October 29, 2018 at 02:08 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Paychecks got bigger last year for many of the top lawyers and executives at some of the nation's largest companies—though some groups have been receiving larger pay bumps than their colleagues, according to a new study.
General counsel received a larger percentage increase than their bosses, though CEOs were paid much more to start: The total median pay for CEOs who work for Equilar 500 companies, a revenue-based index of publicly traded companies in the U.S., increased 3.5 percent from 2016 to 2017, while general counsel at those same companies saw a 6.7 overall pay increase.
But CEOs at companies with between $10 and $20 billion in revenue made four times more than their GCs.
That's according to Equilar's latest “General Counsel Pay Trends” study, which is based on SEC filings from fiscal year 2016 to 2017.
The biggest takeaway from the study is that compensation “increased substantially” for general counsel from the previous year, when they saw a more modest overall pay increase of about 4 percent, according to Robert Barker, a managing partner at executive search consulting firm BarkerGilmore. He contributed to Equilar's report.
“It has to do with the fact that the economy is doing well and GCs are being asked to do more,” Barker said. “They're taking on additional roles in the company, such as government affairs and chief administrative officer.”
While most GCs have been getting raises, the size of the company and the industry in which it operates had a lot to do with how much they received, with GCs at smaller companies getting larger percentage increases.
The average overall pay for GCs at smaller companies with less than $5 billion in revenue grew by nearly 22 percent. GCs at larger companies had more modest pay increases: 6.6 percent at businesses with $10 to $15 billion in revenue and 0.9 percent at companies with more than $20 billion in revenue.
GCs at the larger companies unsurprisingly earned more than their colleagues at smaller operations, however: Median total compensation at companies with revenue greater than $20 billion was $4.5 million, nearly $2 million more than the median pay at companies with revenue between $10 and $20 billion.
Meanwhile, top lawyers at companies with revenue between $5 and $10 billion saw their total median compensation fall by 3.3 percent.
What's behind that development is not exactly clear. But the study notes that “determining the actual worth of a general counsel is not cut and dry. Several factors including leadership ability, internal equity, scope of responsibility, industrial sector, sophistication of legal challenges, regulatory concerns, strength of internal relationships and shareholder return all come into play.”
Things were brighter in the basic materials sector, where GC pay jumped more than 27 percent. Top lawyers for tech and industrial companies also saw overall pay increases of 26 and 25 percent, respectively.
But continuing the best-of-times worst-of-times trend, pay for GCs in the utilities and financial sectors declined by 16.4 percent and 6 percent, respectively.
Larger companies tied more compensation to performance incentives. The largest companies with more than $20 billion in revenue gave their GCs almost twice as much in performance incentives than companies in the $10 to $20 billion revenue realm.
“Companies with a revenue greater than $5 billion tend to grant anywhere from $275,000 to $300,000 in stock awards to their GCs, while companies with below $5 billion in revenue grant about half that amount,” the study states.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Right Amount?: Federal Judge Weighs $1.8M Attorney Fee Request with Strip Club's $15K Award
Kline & Specter and Bosworth Resolve Post-Settlement Fighting Ahead of Courtroom Showdown
6 minute read12-Partner Team 'Surprises' Atlanta Firm’s Leaders With Exit to Launch New Reed Smith Office
4 minute readMorgan Lewis Shutters Shenzhen Office Less Than Two Years After Launch
Trending Stories
- 1Courts Demonstrate Growing Willingness to Sanction Courtroom Misuse of AI
- 2The New Rules of AI: Part 1—Managing Risk
- 3Change Is Coming to the EEOC—But Not Overnight
- 4Med Mal Defense Win Stands as State Appeals Court Rejects Arguments Over Blocked Cross-Examination
- 5Rejecting 'Blind Adherence to Outdated Precedent,’ US Judge Goes His Own Way on Attorney Fees
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250