Michigan State Law Is Set to Become Latest to Ditch Independent Status
A proposal to fully integrate the Michigan State University College of Law into the larger university campus where the school resides is moving forward, offering further evidence that the independent law school model is under intense pressure.
October 29, 2018 at 12:31 PM
3 minute read
Michigan State University College of Law is poised to formally become part of the East Lansing university.
The law school currently operates as a private, independent campus that is affiliated with Michigan State, but the university board of trustees voted Oct. 26 to bring the law school under its umbrella of programs. The plan still requires the approval of the law school's board of trustees.
The merger is the latest sign that the independent law school model is under intense pressure. Six independent law schools have either merged or closed up since 1995, leaving 18 such campuses. That figure is expected to drop to 17 in 2019 when the John Marshall Law School becomes part of the University of Illinois at Chicago. Another standalone law school, Arizona Summit Law School, has stopped holding classes and plans to officially shutter once its remaining students complete their degrees at other schools. Meanwhile, the Thomas Jefferson School of Law has moved out of its $90 million campus and has become California-accredited—a backup plan should the school lose its American Bar Association accreditation.
As with other independent law schools, operating without the financial backing of a larger institution has been a burden for Michigan State's law school, prompting the realignment. Bringing the law school into the university fold will eliminate duplicate administrative functions and make it easier for law students to take courses in other university programs, proponents said.
Michigan State University College of Law was established in 1891 as the Detroit College of Law. It formally affiliated with Michigan State in 1995, and later changed its name and relocated to East Lansing—about 90 miles away from Detroit. While the affiliation allowed for dual degree programs and for law faculty to participate in campus activities the law school's finances were kept separate. (The arrangement is similar to that of Western Michigan University Cooley Law School.) That will change under the new proposal, when control of finances and other aspects of the program are centralized under the larger university.
“Since the original affiliation in 1995, the relationship between the university and the law college has grown increasingly closer and, at each stage, resounded in benefits to both institutions,” law Dean Lawrence Ponoroff told the Lansing State Journal. (He did not respond to a request for comment Monday.)
The law school's board of trustees are set to vote on the plan Wednesday, and Ponoroff said there is widespread support for the proposal among its members. A third of the law school's board members are appointed by the university's board of trustees.
Finances are at the root of the recent spate of independent law school closures and mergers. While some independent law schools have weathered legal education's downturn, others have struggled to stay afloat with fewer students. Unlike law schools within university systems, independent law schools can't turn to central administrations for financial assistance during lean times.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllContract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250