Pittsburgh skyline. Photo: ShutterstockRead the Complaint: US Justice Dept. Charges Pittsburgh Synagogue Shooter
At about 9:50 a.m. Oct. 27 a man armed with handguns and an assault-style rifle walked into the Tree of Life Jewish synagogue in Pittsburgh and opened fire, according to a criminal complaint filed by the U.S. Department of Justice.
October 29, 2018 at 12:54 PM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Legal Intelligencer
At about 9:50 a.m. Oct. 27 a man armed with handguns and an assault-style rifle walked into the Tree of Life Jewish synagogue in Pittsburgh and opened fire, according to a criminal complaint filed by the U.S. Department of Justice.
The criminal complaint, filed with the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania on Monday morning, said Robert Bowers made his way to the third floor of the synagogue in the Squirrel Hill neighborhood, wounding several people before eventually exchanging gunfire with law enforcement officers. Along with injuring four law enforcement officers and others, 11 worshipers were ultimately killed in the shooting, court papers said.
The violent incident quickly sent shock waves throughout the country, as news began to pour out about the shooting and the alleged shooter's anti-Semitic beliefs.
The DOJ charged Bowers, 46, later on Oct. 27 with numerous hate crime counts, including 11 counts of obstruction of exercise of religious belief resulting in death. According to CBS News, prosecutors have since begun the process of getting approval to seek the death penalty against Bowers.
Read the criminal complaint below.
The Allegheny County District Attorney's Office has also charged Bowers with 11 counts of homicide, six counts of attempted homicide, six counts of aggravate assault and 13 counts of ethnic intimidation.
Read the affidavit for the state charges below.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Marketing Co. Sues to Stop Pa.'s New Bar on Lawyers Soliciting Clients Through Text
4 minute read
Pa. High Court Throws Out Disciplinary Charges Over Lawyer's $1M Fee Request
4 minute read
Pittsburgh Jury Returns $29.4M Against Investment Firm That Accused Terminated Contractors of Fraud
4 minute read
With Malpractice Funds Shrinking, Eckert Seamans Brokers New Settlement in Par Funding Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Waterbury Jury Awards $2 Million Verdict Against Eversource
- 2Walter Taggart, Villanova Law Professor, Dies at 81
- 3$2.7M Verdict for Whistleblower Exposes Employer to $300M Claim
- 4Phila. Med Mal Lawyers In for Busy Year as Court Adjusts for Filing Boom
- 5Bonus Parade Continues, With Additional Firms Matching Milbank
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
