Boob Tube Justice for All
If Northwestern Law grad Jerry Springer can be a TV judge, why not Al Roker or Susan Lucci? Here are the daytime television stars we'd like to see dispensing justice from the bench.
October 31, 2018 at 12:29 PM
5 minute read
Jerry Springer as Your Honor?
It just might happen. This week brought news that Jerry Springer—the former ringleader of, arguably, daytime television's wildest hour—is shopping a syndicated judge show featuring himself presiding from the bench. It sounds like Judge Jerry isn't a sure thing yet, but episodes could start airing in 2019.
Springer as judicial lion isn't as much of a stretch as it may seem at first blush. After all, Springer graduated from Northwestern University School of Law in 1968 and did a short stint as the mayor of Cincinnati before launching his namesake talk show in 1991. (It went off the air earlier this year.) All of this got us thinking about other daytime TV staples that we'd like to see behind the bench—from a Hollywood back lot, that is. We've taken a few liberties here, no J.D. required, and present both the case for and against these judicial nominees.
|Bob Barker
The Case For: We miss Bob Barker, who hung up his ridiculously skinny microphone and left “The Price Is Right” set back in 2007. (Drew Carey, you are no Bob Barker.) This seems like the perfect opportunity for the 94-year-old to stage a comeback. After all, sitting on the bench is much less physically taxing than spinning that giant, glittery wheel.
The Case Against: As much as this pains us to say, Barker comes with some baggage. More specifically, the accusations in the 1990s that he sexually harassed several of “The Price is Right”'s models, known as “Barker's Beauties,” and other show employees. The cases settled, but that name alone might be disqualifying.
|Susan Lucci
The Case For: If anyone knows about justice—and injustice—it's iconic soap star Lucci, who played “All My Children” villain Erica Kane for its entire 41-year run before the show was canceled in 2011. Lucci was famously passed over for a daytime Emmy 18 times before finally snagging the prize in 1999. Justice delayed is justice denied.
The Case Against: Viewers may have a hard time dissociating Lucci from her most famous femme fatale role, in which she is married roughly 10 times (there is disagreement online about the number of valid weddings); seduces plenty of married men; and generally wreaks havoc on the town of Pine Valley.
|Al Roker
The Case For: OK, technically Roker is more of a morning TV star rather than a daytime one, having spent the past 22 years delivering the weather on “The Today Show.” But honestly, who doesn't love Al Roker? He's the Mr. Congeniality of daytime programming. It's hard to imagine people yelling and screaming at each other in the Judge Roker's courtroom.
The Case Against: Roker's biggest strength is also a potential weakness as far as the typical daytime judge show goes. His courtroom may be remarkably civil, but viewers want a clear resolution. I have a feeling Judge Roker would bend over backward to find compromises so each party leaves court happy. That's a snooze from a viewer's standpoint.
|Oprah Winfrey
The Case For: Obviously no list would be complete without the Queen of Daytime TV. Seriously, why hasn't Oprah had a judge show yet? (Probably because she doesn't need the money.) But viewers trust Oprah implicitly, so she wouldn't need to establish any credibility. Bonus: You never know when she'll give out free cars.
The Case Against: Oprah has had some lapses in judgement over the years. Remember her boosterism of fraudulent author James Frey? Critics have also taken her to task for promoting pseudoscience in the form of self-help and questionable medical advice. And who knows. Oprah might be too busy running for president in 2020 to tape a judge show.
|Emeril Legasse
The Case For: Sure, celebrity chef and cooking show host Legasse may not have the firmest grasp on the law, but he seems to have a lot of fun in whatever he does. We'd love to see him dispensing justice from the bench with his signature catchphrase: “Bam!”
The Case Against: Again, taking the bench is pretty different from presiding over the kitchen. We're not entirely convinced that Legasse's culinary expertise will transfer over to the law. But daytime television is pretty snoozy these days so, why not throw caution to the wind? He just might “kick it up a notch!” (See what we did there?)
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Unlawful Release'?: Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute read'Transforming Children Into ATMs'?: Roblox, Epic Games Sued for Allegedly Fueling Addictive Behavior in Minors
Trending Stories
- 1Recent Decisions Regarding the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- 2The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 3Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 4For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 5As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250