For Breast-Pumping Lawyer Moms, Accommodations Often Fall Short
MothersEsquire, a group with 3,000 lawyer-moms spread around the nation, is working to improve workplace conditions.
October 31, 2018 at 03:21 PM
7 minute read
The old saying, “Don't cry over spilled milk,” doesn't apply when you're a nursing lawyer-mom, using a toilet as a table while pumping your breast milk during your practice group's annual retreat.
Utilizing the bathroom as a makeshift baby-food kitchen wasn't labor and employment litigator Elise Elam's first choice. She recalled she was relegated to the loo only after staff in the retreat facility offered up a room with a non-closing door that left a gap where she could see the speaker talking to all her colleagues. The toilet stall was private, at least. After she finished pumping and started to gather her gear, that's when it happened: Elam's milk spilled all over the toilet and floor. She acknowledges—she cried.
“It was stressful,” explained Elam, staff attorney at Frost Brown Todd in Cincinnati.
Like many nursing lawyer-moms, Elam is happy with her law firm's breastfeeding accommodations—she has a private office and closes her door with a do-not-disturb sign when she expresses her milk—yet she continues facing struggles when depositions, hearings or legal conferences take her away from home base for extended periods of time. Courthouses have emerged as a primary problem area for nursing lawyers who need a private place, and time, to pump milk for their babies.
One group advocating on behalf of breastfeeding attorneys is MothersEsquire, a Facebook group with 3,000 lawyer-moms spread around the nation, which created a breastfeeding accommodations advisory committee in early 2017.
“Part of the reason why it is so critical is because it's a metaphor in my mind to what happens to professional women with children throughout their careers. All of a sudden, they're at this intersection between a core part of being a mother—feeding your child—and being a professional,” said Michelle Browning Coughlin, who founded MothersEsquire five years ago. “It literally feels like a choice between being a good mom, or good lawyer.”
The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that babies drink only breast milk for the first six months because of numerous health benefits. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data shows that breastfeeding rates have increased over the past 10 years, and mothers now stick with breastfeeding longer. The agency noted in its 2018 breastfeeding report card that 83 percent of babies were exclusively breastfed at birth, which is up from 74 percent, compared with the 2008 report card. This year's data said 25 percent of babies were still breastfeeding exclusively at 6 months old, compared to just 12 percent in 2008. A lack of support at work is one of the main reasons women quit breastfeeding early, the agency noted.
Although the Affordable Care Act in 2010 required employers to provide a private place and break time for nursing mothers who are hourly, it doesn't apply to lawyers on salary, noted Liz Morris, whose work as deputy director at the Center for WorkLife Law at the University of California, Hastings College of the Law focuses on gender equity and workers' rights for pregnant and breastfeeding moms.
Morris said Title VII of the Civil Rights Act includes a prohibition on discrimination based on pregnancy, childbirth and related medical conditions—breastfeeding counts—yet that law doesn't clearly provide a right to accommodations. A patchwork of state laws do apply to lawyers, promising breaks and a private space to pump. Even when a lawyer works in a state without strong breastfeeding protections, her law firm may provide accommodations voluntarily—but this varies widely.
“Some law firms pay to ship breast milk home when lawyers are on a work trip,” Morris explained. “Some people lose their jobs over this.”
While many MothersEsquire members who are nursing moms are happy with their law firm's accommodations, other lawyer-moms have experienced disappointment, said Coughlin, partner in Wyatt Tarrant & Combs in Louisville, Kentucky. Some law firms have rules not to lock your door, and the recent fad for law firm offices to have glass walls and doors is not ideal for a nursing lawyer who needs privacy.
“Even in firms where they may have an office, often the offices are not as private as they have been, or women say, 'I'm able to lock my door; however, every time I'm in there, someone is banging on my door or keeps sending me messages or calling me,'” Coughlin said.
She recalled that years ago when she nursed her two children, who are now 11 and 13, the only place she could pump while out and about was the bathroom. Sadly, that hasn't changed for a lot of the MothersEsquire members.
Pushing for courthouse breastfeeding accommodations is one of the first goals of MothersEsquire's breastfeeding committee, explained committee chairwoman Kristin Worthen, who's currently nursing her 10-month-old son and has two older children.
In Worthen's hometown courthouse, one member of the MothersEsquire breastfeeding committee worked with the local bar association on a solution. The bar association has a room at the courthouse where any lawyer can go in between hearings to work, relax or eat lunch. The committee member sent a letter and convinced the bar to use cubical walls to create a semi-private space inside of the break room for pumping.
“They were supportive, and didn't pay for any supplies needed for it, but agreed we could use the room for that purpose,” added Worthen, corporate counsel for a Texas technology company.
Law firms could help sponsor a courthouse pumping space by providing chairs and partitions, and encouraging judges and court administrators to support breastfeeding lawyers. She said bar associations have a large role to play in helping attorneys get better nursing accommodations in courthouses, CLE events and the bar exam.
On the national stage, the American Bar Association Young Lawyer's Division is aware of the problem and working on a solution. It's drafting a resolution to encourage courts and legislatures to create lactation rooms, said director Robin Rone.
“One of our members, the lead drafter of the resolution, happened to be pregnant and is nursing and it was something that was front of mind for her and others,” Rone said.
Sarretta McDonough, president of the National Association of Women Lawyers, said the association has focused on encouraging law firms and corporations to support lawyers who return to work after having a baby, which included making nursing attorneys comfortable with facilities to pump at work. Many law firms and corporations have made strides in providing dedicated spaces for nursing lawyers, she said, but there's still a gap in the public sector—especially courthouses.
“Remember, most of these courthouses were built at times it was just white males going to court,” McDonough said. “We've focused so much on the private sector—we haven't focused enough on public facilities.”
MothersEsquire member Cassie Springer Ayeni didn't wait around for an accommodation—she forged a path herself. Springer Ayeni, president and founder of Springer Ayeni in Oakland, California, has four kids—they're now 10, 8, 2 and 8 months—and she's brought every one of them to work with her at her three-attorney firm for the first year of their lives.
She'd arrange for family members to care for the children when she had unavoidable work conflicts, or schedule her associates for certain court appearances, but otherwise, she brought her babies whereever she went for work. Rather than pumping, she just nursed the babies on the spot.
“I nursed him during a presentation this year. It's crazy when I think about it, but people, this is a normal part of life: We feed our children. I feel people need to get over it and understand, and if they don't, maybe I can start to change their minds by bringing some normalcy to it,” she said.
Angela Morris is a freelance journalist. Follow her on Twitter at @AMorrisReports.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAm Law 200 Firm to Defend PUMA in Latest Quarrel Over Patented Shoe Technology
Health Care Giants Sue FTC, Allege Lina Khan Using Loaded Process to Vilify Pharmacy Benefit Managers
3 minute readChicago Midsize Firm Will Combine With Miami Boutique To Form Antitrust Powerhouse
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How I Made Partner: 'Develop a Practice Area You Really Care About ,' Says Jennifer Gniady of Stradley Ronon
- 2Indian Billionaire Gautam Adani Indicted in Brooklyn for Alleged Orchestration of $250 Million Bribery Plot
- 3Eagle Pharma Founder Sues Company to Recoup Cost of SEC Investigation
- 4GC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
- 5Legal Events for Georgia Lawyers
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250