Weil Now Lets Associates Work From Home Weekly
Third-years and up can start working one day a week from home under the new policy, which the firm said recognizes that millennial expectations are "different."
November 16, 2018 at 03:25 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Earlier this year, Weil, Gotshal & Manges announced it would shorten its partner track by two years in an attempt to retain its younger talent. The New York-based firm is now doubling down on efforts to win over associates by instituting a formal work-from-home policy that launched earlier this month.
The new policy, which officially launched Nov. 5, allows all of Weil's third-year and more senior associates in the U.S. to work from home up to one day a week. First- and second-year associates can occasionally work remotely with the advanced approval of their supervising partners or counsel.
The idea for the work-from-home program was just one of several generated by a task force of partners at Weil who were charged in 2016 with tackling the issue of work-life balance. The shortened partner track also emanated from the task force.
Prior to the work-from-home policy's rollout earlier this month, Weil ran a six-month trial of its remote working policy in New York to iron out some of the logistics and the generational kinks.
“There are differences in the generations,” said Barry Wolf, the firm's executive partner and chair of its management committee. “Millennials are a terrific generation … but they're different.”
Associates aren't looking to work less hard, he said. Rather, they're just looking for some flexibility in the workplace. But working outside of the office is very different from the experiences of the older generation, which had to spend sometimes six to seven days a week in the office.
“That's what they're used to,” Wolf said. “So it naturally would take some learning, some trying, some adapting for people now to understand that now you can work as efficiently and as well if someone is at home.”
As the war for talent heats up, many law firms have turned to work-from-home policies to cater to associates' desires for flexibility in the workplace.
The American Lawyer's 2017 Midlevel Associates Survey noted that work-life balance was the main motivator in whether associates might consider leaving their current firm. Last spring, Baker McKenzie, Jackson Lewis and Morgan, Lewis & Bockius all announced their own remote working policies, among many others.
But do remote working policies really build loyalty? One-third of global employees always or very often work remotely, but a recent study by Harvard Business Review found that remote workers are much less likely to stay at their companies long-term.
The study found that only 5 percent of remote workers see themselves working at their company for their entire career, although the study is not necessarily applicable in Weil's case, because the firm caps the number of days each week a lawyer can work remotely. The firm is convinced that its work-from-home policy, in addition to its new partner track, will help it keep and develop its younger talent.
“We're in a professional services business and our assets are our people,” Wolf said. “You need to attract and retain the best and brightest, and this is all in that effort.”
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNot a Shield, but a Weapon? Blue Cross Accused of Antitrust Practices
2 minute readUber Not Responsible for Turning Over Information on 'Dangerous Riders' to Competitor, Judge Finds
5 minute readBallooning Workloads, Dearth of Advancement Opportunities Prime In-House Attorneys to Pull Exit Hatch
Trending Stories
- 1Largest Law Firms: Firm Leadership and Practice Areas
- 2Largest Law Firms: New Jersey and Firmwide Attorney Count
- 3Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Marc Mandel, Senior Vice President & General Counsel at EXOS
- 4Florida Seeks to Short-Circuit Tech Fight
- 5From Tires to Tracks: Goodyear Chief Risk Officer Joins Union Pacific as Legal Chief
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250