Improve gender diversity or we won't use you – in-house lawyers warn firms to up their game
GC reveals threat to withdraw work if law firm did not include partners in gender pay gap reporting
November 30, 2018 at 08:46 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Senior in-house lawyers have warned that law firms which fail to improve diversity within their ranks will lose out on work, with a call to arms to hold firms to account on improving female representation.
The issue was raised at the LegalWeek CONNECT conference yesterday (29 November), where a panel including Bupa group legal director Janet McCarthy, Serco GC David Eveleigh and Barclays head of external engagement Stephanie Hamon discussed how GCs can drive change within law firms.
Eveleigh revealed that last year he told one law firm that if it did not include partners in its gender pay gap reporting, he would no longer use it for work. The law firm subsequently complied after he spoke directly to the firm's senior partner.
The panel discussion, which was chaired by Obelisk Support CEO Dana Denis-Smith – the founder of the First 100 Years project, which charts the progress of women in law – also saw McCarthy issue a call to action to the lawyers in the audience to start conversations within their firms on this subject.
McCarthy – who joined Bupa last month from the Santa Fe Group, where she was chief legal officer – claimed that "law firms don't care about diversity unless their buyers do", and encouraged in-house lawyers with buying power to call out firms with sub-par female representation.
"I want to show young lawyers that it is possible to stand up and change the world today," she said. "I believe that if everyone starts that conversation, we can start a butterfly effect."
McCarthy said that at BUPA, "women reign", and she is among several women in senior management positions at the company, but added that she believes in-house legal departments do not need to be paragons of virtue on diversity themselves, to demand it from the law firms they use.
The panel also discussed what in-house lawyers can do to improve the gender balance within their own workforces and firms.
Eveleigh – who was last night named GC of the Year at the British Legal Awards – recalled attending an event held by several law firms, where a number of junior female associates approached him to request he start the conversation about improving gender balance with their senior partner.
He said: "You can support them by having that debate with their partners. I can use my buying power and also have those conversations."
Hamon agreed, saying the lawyers she works with often ask that she feed back to management about how important prioritising the subject should be.
She added: "It is easy to demonise law firms, but it's about positive reinforcement as well. We recognise that a challenge sits on our side too – it's about sharing best practice."
Hamon added that while the situation needs improvement, she believes people should be buoyed by the fact that the UK is making more progress on this issue than other regions such as continental Europe and the US.
She cited a particularly bad example demonstrated by one of Barclays' external law firms, which attended a meeting on how they were tackling the diversity issue "with a 60-page booklet and three men in their 50s".
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Not A Kindergarten Teacher’: Judge Blasts Keller Postman, Jenner & Block, in Mass Arb Dispute
6 minute readSolana Labs Co-Founder Allegedly Pocketed Ex-Wife’s ‘Millions of Dollars’ of Crypto Gains
4 minute readInsurer Not Required to Cover $29M Wrongful Death Judgment, Appeals Court Rules
Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Trending Stories
- 1Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 2Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
- 3Foreign-Company Lobbyists Would Need to Register Under Proposed DOJ Regulation
- 4'Fancy Dress': ERISA Claim Accuses Plan Administrator and Cigna Affiliates of Co-Pay Maximizer Scheme
- 5The American Lawyer's Top Stories of 2024
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250