Working Remotely Is on the Rise, But It Comes With Its Share of Downsides
While new technology and changing attitudes have allowed many lawyers to work remotely, such telecommuting can lead to overwork and stunted career growth.
December 05, 2018 at 12:30 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legal Tech News
Lawyers working remotely is on the rise as technology becomes more accessible and law firms become more flexible with how their attorneys operate. But working remotely also brings possible risks and stresses.
Philadelphia attorney Carole Sheffield, for instance, described the “double-edged” sword that lawyers working remotely may face. After a day of counseling clients and interacting with colleagues, a possible error may pop into your mind, awaking you from a once peaceful slumber.
“I've woken in the middle of the night saying, 'Oh my God, did I do that right,'” said Sheffield, an Anderson Kill shareholder and co-chair of the Philadelphia Bar Association's wellness committee.
Sheffield said a lawyer can alleviate that late-night bolt of panic by quickly logging into the firm's network from home and double-checking the possible issue. On the other hand, a client can demand their counsel work during the weekend, and lawyers' ability to readily work from home adds to the stress, she explained.
Still, more lawyers are working remotely than potentially ever before.
AbacusNext's Tomas Suros, who consults law firms on their software, said in 2014, he noticed a shift in Big Law adopting their corporate clients' flexible and remote work schedules.
“I've seen the firms go from a very risk-averse profession specifically with technology; they were stuck with faxing,” Suros said. In the past, he explained, large firms allowed only lawyers with certain years of experience and responsibilities and in certain practices to telecommute.
But as technology's reliability and security improved, law firms began to see the benefits of allowing lawyers to slash their commute time and do more work and bill for more hours, Suros said.
“You can often get more done when you are at home,” added Cynthia Thomas Calvert, a lawyer and president of Workforce 21C, which works to destigmatize flexible work programs. “You have less constant interruptions and you can get work done.”
But Calvert cautioned that working alone comes with a caveat.
“Lawyers are often workaholics, no surprise there, and it can be hard to know when to turn off the lights. … When you work from home, the desk is always there.”
In addition to leading to overwork, predominantly working outside of the office may also impede a lawyer's career development.
“We forget that we do need to have the small talk and conversations that will lead to deeper relationships in the firm,” Calvert said.
Calvert suggested lawyers who work remotely prioritize making and developing relationships with current and possible clients and colleagues. She also advised lawyers to use video conferencing instead of relying heavily on texting and emailing clients and colleagues.
“When people work remotely 100 percent of the time, it can impact their advancement at a firm.” If a lawyer isn't front and center, a partner or rainmaker may not be aware of a lawyer's work. They may also assume a lawyer constantly working remotely is slacking off.
Still, law firms are using remote work as a feature to entice possible hires. Suros of AbacusNext said law firms are promoting their technology and openness to lawyers working remotely to attract lawyers.
“Firms now present their forward-thinking technology to attract individuals that have used technology previously.” That attraction is essential in pulling in millennial lawyers too, Suros said.
Calvert agreed, but warned that associates fresh out of law school or clerkships should ease into working remotely.
“It's a very valid concern that new lawyers need to learn office politics, office culture and office structure.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAre Firms and In-House Teams Courting Technological Debt With Ambitious Purchases?
6 minute readMeta Workers Aren't of One Mind on Company's Retreat From DEI, Fact-Checking
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250