Can Posting Lawyers' Email Addresses Online Pose a Cyber Risk?
Cybersecurity professionals said the benefits of publicly listing attorneys' law firm email addresses outweigh the risks, so long as lawyers are equipped with appropriate cyber training.
December 13, 2018 at 10:45 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legal Tech News
It's customary for law firms to list their lawyers' email addresses online to allow prospective clients to contact an attorney. But do these public listings also lead to a heightened risk of cyberattacks?
Some cybersecurity professionals have argued that the benefits of placing lawyers' email addresses online can outweigh potential risks—if lawyers are equipped with the proper training.
“Once a threat actor has targets in mind, they will often send malicious emails to attorneys with lures related to new or existing client matters,” explained Charles Carmakal, vice president of cybersecurity platform FireEye. “The emails typically contain links to websites that attempt to collect credentials or malicious attachments that deploy backdoors on victim computers.”
Carmakal said removing email addresses from a law firm's website to prevent targeted attacks may “possibly slow down the attacker by a little bit … [but] it's easy to guess an email address,” because many organizations follow a consistent format.
Indeed, the benefits of posting lawyers' email addresses online outweigh the risks, Carmakal and others said.
“I don't know how lawyers can function without their email addresses being publicly available,” said Chicago-based Hinshaw & Culbertson partner and security officer Steven Puiszis.
Instead of removing their email addresses, Puiszis recommended that lawyers not post too much information on social media.
“One of the things I tell people is, the more information you post about yourself or family members on social media, the easier it is for a hacker to craft an email that seems to come from someone you know or trust,” Puiszis said.
Some also suggested cybersecurity exercises and training to protect lawyers' data. “[It's] not dangerous or inappropriate to put your name out there, but you have to train your employees to look out for certain things,” said David Lipscomb, an IT professional and president of BDPA Philadelphia, an organization seeking to connect diverse IT and science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) professionals to development programs.
“I think what happens is most people need to be educated by their IT team or general counsel,” Lipscomb said.
Lipscomb cited the American Bar Association's technology competency rule that states, in part, “to maintain the requisite knowledge and skill, a lawyer should keep abreast of changes in the law and its practice, including the benefits and risks associated with relevant technology.” Ongoing cybersecurity training and assistance may fulfill that requirement, Lipscomb said.
Since the ABA added that rule of professional conduct in 2012, many state bars have adopted it with mixed competency results. Alaska and Montana were the most recent states to add such a requirement, according to LawSites.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFormer FBI Cyber Expert on How AI Will Exacerbate Law Firms' Wire Transfer Vulnerabilities
The Debate on Data Scraping Was Almost Over—Until Generative AI Rekindled It
8 minute readMaryland Signs Data Privacy Act Into Law—And Bucks Several Privacy Trends
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250