My Life Now: 1L Finals at a T14
A sense of panic lurks in the background of every class, every passing hello in the hallways and even every weekend night at the bars.
December 18, 2018 at 09:25 AM
6 minute read
The famous Gothic-style buildings on the Quad at Michigan Law School are part of the institution's draw. During my admissions visit on a sunny March day last year, I thought the school's design embodied everything I expected law school to be: interesting and serious, charming and traditional, exciting and important.
Now as a 1L heading into my first bout of exams, the Ann Arbor skies are always gray instead of blue, and the law school's medieval architecture seems more ominous than inspirational.
The air of anxiety among 1Ls this time of year has ramped up significantly from the mid-semester mood, back when 2Ls and 3Ls and professors and deans told us not to worry about supplements or practice exams or outlining. “Just keep up with your reading and pay attention in class,” they said. “You'll be fine,” they said.
But they also said we should spend the Thanksgiving break diving into exam preparations. They directed us to outline banks where we could find hundreds and hundreds of pages of review for our courses. Yet they said we should still make our own outlines, obviously, to make sure we grasp the material. And, offhandedly, they said to maybe look into summer jobs, too, since the National Association for Law Placement allows us to submit applications starting Dec. 1.
And then they told us about the format of the exams and, vaguely, what material we were expected to know. (To quote my Contracts professor: “Everything.”) And the Office of Student Life sent emails reminding us to take care of ourselves. (“SLEEP,” we were commanded.)
Naturally, this has culminated in a sense of panic that lurks in the background of every class, every session of professor office hours, every passing hello in the hallways of Hutchins Hall and even every weekend night at the bars.
There are some benefits to the omnipresent dread of final exams, though. Personally, I've found that working frantically under pressure prevents me from overthinking. This is key in law school, where it's possible to get so lost in the fact pattern of a case or in the reasoning of a court that my Criminal Law notes indicate that murder is not against the law at all, which just doesn't seem quite right.
Before law school, I worked as a sports writer, and I think some of my best stories came when the first 3½ quarters of a game had been lopsided. Just when I thought my article was nearly done, the losing team would suddenly rally, launching the game into overtime and winning—with the final score posted about 20 minutes before the late-night deadline I had to meet for my story to make it into the morning newspaper.
The closing weeks of my first semester of law school feel like a longer, higher stakes version of those urgent 20 minutes spent rewriting a full 700-word article for print the next day.
Besides forcing me to commit to schoolwork and produce tangible results—yes, my outlines are done, nicely concise at about 55 pages each—the 1L end-of-semester hysteria does lend itself to a certain sense of camaraderie. I can't speak for other law schools, but very few people at Michigan seem to view law school as a competition. Exam advice and study materials are shared ubiquitously, and the curve is an afterthought—in fact, I still have no idea how the curve works.
The recurring question of “How's studying going?” is asked with empathy, never antagonism. The answer is typically an unintelligible groan—we panic irrationally, but we can at least laugh at ourselves while we do it. I also expect this collegial spirit to be in even fuller force the moment we walk out of the final Criminal Law exam at 11 a.m. on Dec. 21. Thoughts of that moment keep me going through dark times in the depths of Michigan Law's underground library.
Plus, the bonds formed by the 1L experience extend far beyond current classmates. 2Ls and 3Ls look upon us with kindness, giving us candy, insight into what snacks to bring to four-hour exams and unheeded assurances that we'll do just fine. Even the professors who write our exams have regaled us with horror stories from their own first-year experiences. I'm not sure if these were intended to alleviate our panic by showing that they turned out well despite their struggles or add to our panic by showing that even the smartest among us are going to struggle, inducing us to study even more.
Standing at a football tailgate earlier this fall at the University of Notre Dame (my alma mater—Go Irish! Sorry, Wolverines) with my father and his former Notre Dame Law classmates in the Class of 1989, I was of course asked how law school was going. My answer then—as now—was “Ask me again after exams,” which instantly led them to launch into recollections of their own exam traumas. My dad says he still has nightmares about blanking on his Civil Procedure exam.
I suppose the moral of this story is that law school exams have become no less terrifying than they were 30 years ago, and I'm still going to remember exactly how terrifying they were in 2048.
But on the bright side, there is substantial evidence that my 1L classmates and I actually will come out of exams alive—if not well—and will go on to become lawyers who can look back and laugh about the hypothetical fact pattern on the Crim exam that no one understood. For now, I remain skeptical.
Renee Griffin is a first-year student at University of Michigan Law School.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPenn State Dickinson Law Dean Named President-Elect of Association of American Law Schools
UChicago Law Professors Release Desk Reference Breaking Down Crypto, Web 3 for Attorneys
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250