A giant thumbs-up button marks the entrance to the Facebook campus, located at 1601 Willow Rd. in Menlo Park, California. Photo: Jason Doiy/ALMFacebook Is Being Sued by DC's Attorney General Over 'Failure' to Protect User Privacy
The 21-page complaint in D.C. Superior Court alleges “lax oversight and enforcement of third-party applications.”
December 19, 2018 at 01:37 PM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
The District of Columbia is bringing suit against social media giant Facebook Inc. over the company's “failure” to “honor its promise” to protect the personal data of users.
The 21-page complaint, filed in the D.C. Superior Court, alleges that Facebook's “lax oversight and enforcement of third-party applications” demonstrates how the company falls short of its commitment to its users, citing the Cambridge Analytica scandal as “just one example.” The issue of third-party app sharing separately arose last week after the company announced that outside companies may have had access to the private photos of nearly 7 million users.
A Facebook statement indicated the company was responsive. “We're reviewing the complaint and look forward to continuing our discussions with attorneys general in D.C. and elsewhere,” the statement read.
The lawsuit claims that the policies and business practices are in violation of D.C. consumer protection laws, citing Facebook's “failure to adequately disclose” data compromises its users, as well as its surreptitious sharing of data with third parties while overriding specific privacy settings.
“Facebook could have prevented third parties from misusing its consumers' data had it implemented and maintained reasonable oversight of third-party applications consistent with its representations in its public statements, terms of service, and policies,” the complaint says. “The District brings this case to ensure that Facebook is held accountable for its failure to protect the privacy of its consumers' personal data.”
Read the Complaint:
D.C. is far from the only front on which Facebook is running into legal trouble over its handling of user data. The company is currently facing multidistrict litigation stemming from the Cambridge Analytica scandal. Meanwhile, the Irish Data Protection Commission recently launched an inquiry into Facebook under Europe's General Data Protection Regulation over the company's security bug that potentially shared data with third-party app providers. A fine under the GDPR could potentially lead to a $1.63 billion penalty, or about 4 percent of Facebook's global revenue.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Pre-Internet High Court Ruling Hobbling Efforts to Keep Tech Giants from Using Below-Cost Pricing to Bury Rivals
6 minute read
Will Khan Resign? FTC Chair Isn't Saying Whether She'll Stick Around After Giving Up Gavel
‘Badge of Honor’: SEC Targets CyberKongz in Token Registration Dispute
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Suspended NY Judge Who Threatened to Shoot Black Party Crashers Says She Won't Fight Removal
- 2Kelly Hart Secures $27M Trade Secrets Misappropriation Final Judgment in Fort Worth Trial
- 3How Legal Research And Analytics Changed in 2024
- 4On the Move and After Hours: Blick Law; Archer; Duane Morris
- 5'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
