Trends for Midsize Firms Heading Into 2019
From a heightened focus on cybersecurity, to offering a hybrid remote/in-office work option, here are some trends for midsize firms to look out for as the new year approaches.
December 19, 2018 at 01:00 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Pro Mid-Market
1. Trend: A heightened focus on cybersecurity, risk and insurance.
Midsize law firms, like their brethren at large firms, will continue to put an increased focus on mitigation of cyber risk through enhanced security, protocols and more sophisticated risk management. We will see greater use of outside risk management consultants working directly with midsize/ firms to address new risks and gaps on coverages.
2. Trend: Continued lateral acquisitions.
Midsize law firms will continue making robust lateral partner acquisitions. Competition for the best candidates has increased, so midsize firms will need to be even more creative in their offerings. Midsize firms will need to better exploit their value propositions to clients in order to attract laterals from larger firms. Firms will also need to put an added emphasis on retaining their best talent.
3. Trend: Greater exploitation of value proposition: specialty work for larger firms and working with middle-market companies.
Larger clients will continue to gravitate to midsize firms for certain types of work. Midsize firms are in a unique position to provide more cost-effective, efficient services in matters not requiring large firm infrastructures. For example, midsize firms may be in a better position to provide more cost-effective services in specialized areas such as construction law, office space leasing or IP prosecution where larger teams and multiple offices are typically not necessary. In-house clients are becoming aware of the advantages of using midsize law firms for legal work like this.
4. Trend: Collaboration with different sized firms—both larger and smaller.
With the goal of providing the most value-driven services to clients, firms of all sizes are realizing the benefits of partnering with each other. You will see greater collaboration between large firms and midsize firms in working on projects together where they can each do what they do best and provide better service to clients. Clients have become more aware of these advantages and may push all of us toward this collaboration model.
5. Trend: Continued pressure to control costs to control pricing structure.
Midsize law firms will face significant pressure to maintain their present cost structures in order to preserve their favorable rate structures. However, with increasing costs of staffing, IT, insurance and various other expenses, this will present challenges.
6. Trend: Offer innovative programming to distinguish team members' midsize experience from larger firms.
Midsize firms have a unique opportunity to lead the industry in developing innovative programming to enhance the professional development of employees. These types of programs will help midsize firms stand out from their competitors, and will aid in attracting and retaining employees. These programs should place a greater emphasis on the longer-term professional development of attorneys and other team members.
7. Trend: Increased hoteling. Combo of remote and “in-office” working.
Companies have started to realize that having their employees work remotely 100 percent of the time isn't always the best solution to foster collaboration and camaraderie, but they still want to be attuned to the needs of their people, so offering a hybrid combination of remote and in-office working can be a better solution for everyone.
Alan Tarter is managing partner of Tarter Krinsky & Drogin.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllExits Leave American Airlines, SiriusXM, Spotify Searching for New Legal Chiefs
2 minute readInside Track: Why Relentless Self-Promoters Need Not Apply for GC Posts
Trending Stories
- 1With DEI Top of Mind, Black Judges Discuss Growing Up During Segregation, Efforts to Diversify the Profession
- 2Big Law's Middle East Bet: Will It Pay Off?
- 3'Translate Across Disciplines': Paul Hastings’ New Tech Transactions Leader
- 4Milbank’s Revenue and Profits Surge Following Demand Increases Across the Board
- 5Fourth Quarter Growth in Demand and Worked Rates Coincided with Countercyclical Dip, New Report Indicates
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250