EEOC Braces for Bottleneck as 3 Nominees Languish
“Much of the core enforcement work will remain in place, but there will be delays in addressing some of the larger issues,” former Obama-era EEOC chair Jenny Yang said.
December 20, 2018 at 01:29 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission could soon be whittled down to only two members and lose its quorum thanks to a U.S. Senate dispute over pending nominees, potentially halting any new policy announcements and large investigations.
Democratic and Republican senators haven't reached a deal that would approve two Republican nominees: Janet Dhillon, former Burlington Stores general counsel, for EEOC chair, and West Point professor Daniel Gade. Obama-era Democratic member Chai Feldblum, whose renomination has riled some conservatives, is also awaiting confirmation. Trump's nominee for EEOC general counsel, Sharon Gustafson, a Virginia solo practitioner, is also pending approval.
|EEOC Stalemate: At a Glance
|- Democrats are upset Republicans won't approve Obama-era Democratic commissioner Chai Feldblum
- Feldblum has pushed back against criticism that she disrespects religious liberty protections
- Two Republican nominees, Janet Dhillon and Daniel Gade, are also awaiting confirmation
As the Senate prepares to leave for its holiday break, the EEOC could start the new year without a quorum.
“This means the potential of a shutdown of significant litigation,” said former EEOC general counsel David Lopez, now co-dean of Rutgers Law School. “The big cases, cases where there is a policy change.”
A stalemate has ensued over the EEOC nominees after Republican Sen. Mike Lee of Utah reportedly blocked Feldblum's appointment, and Democrats refused to clear the Republican nominees without her as part of the package deal. Lee has said that Feldblum, the first openly gay EEOC commissioner, curtailed the rights of religious groups. Feldblum has pushed back against this characterization.
“I believe there are some situations in which the rights of religious liberty for organizations who believe homosexuality is sinful will conflict with and should prevail over the rights of LGBT people who might experience discrimination at the hands of such religious organizations,” Feldblum wrote this week at Medium. “The reason I believe that is because I care deeply about preserving religious pluralism in our country — even if it that means protecting religious organizations whose views I disagree with.”
Lopez, of counsel at Outten & Golden, said the attempt to block Feldblum represents an “inexplicable political landscape” that will weaken an agency tasked with upholding federal civil rights laws for private employers.
Feldblum would be forced to leave the commission at the start of the year if she is not confirmed in the next several days. The remaining commissioners are acting chair Victoria Lipnic, a Republican appointee, and Democratic member Charlotte Burrows.
The EEOC said Wednesday it is “planning and preparing for the loss of a quorum, should it happen.”
In the event of a loss of quorum, the agency would not be able to bring some cases. The commission votes on whether or not to bring certain lawsuits that would result in a significant cost or that examine a novel legal principle. Day-to-day activities will continue, and some work would be deferred to the office of the general counsel and to the regional offices.
Guidance for employers, such the recent advice about harassment in the workplace, and updated wellness rules, would also need to be cleared by the commission.
Part of the EEOC's wellness rules, which were struck down by a federal court after an AARP lawsuit, were formally vacated in an administrative action this week—one sign the agency might be moving forward on certain issues while it still has a quorum. The agency was required to take action on those rules by Jan. 1, 2019.
Pay data collection, another measure struck by the Trump administration, also could be addressed by a full commission once the new members are in place.
Amicus briefs filed in appellate courts need commission approval. The EEOC weighs in on issues of developing law in the discrimination space. The agency led the charge, for example, on cases promoting LGBT protections in the workplace. The Trump administration's Justice Department has lined up against the EEOC in several cases.
“Much of the core enforcement work will remain in place, but there will be delays in addressing some of the larger issues,” former EEOC chair Jenny Yang said. “There are always important, evolving issues that the EEOC is tasked to resolve.”
Carolyn Wheeler, senior counsel at Katz, Marshall & Banks and a former EEOC appellate attorney, said much of the agency's activity is delegated beyond the commission, so it will still function.
A two-member commission can approve certain actions, Wheeler said, and once a five-member board is back in place those actions can be later ratified. “There is so much of the day-to-day operations that operate on auto-pilot,” Wheeler said.
Read more:
US Justice Department Opens New Front Against EEOC
|➤➤ Get employment law news and commentary straight to your in-box with Labor of Law, a new Law.com briefing. Learn more and sign up here.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSupreme Court Hearing on Facebook's Alleged Nondisclosure Yields 'Freakish' Hypotheticals
'Even Playing Field?' Wiley Rein Intervenes in Federal Election Campaign Spending Row
3 minute readEnd of an (Chevron) Era: DC Circuit Tackles Challenge to Fishing Monitor Rule, Again
Trending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250