Brave New World: How Younger Advisors See Tech Changing the Business
New survey shows sharp differences between older and younger advisors on how technology can help them expand their businesses.
December 26, 2018 at 12:43 PM
3 minute read
Marketing TechnologyThe original version of this story was published on Law.com
The generational divide is as evident as the San Andreas fault when it comes to how financial advisors see technology altering their businesses.
In a new survey of 375 wealth managers by iCapital Network, almost 77% of advisors under the age of 40 believe that technology will level the playing field in wealth management in the next five years vs. 27% for advisors over 40.
"While older, more established advisors are a bit more dubious of the value technology enhancements can bring to their practice — their younger counterparts are eager to find the solutions that will allow them to expand their services, scale their practices, and build client loyalty," according to to the study.
Plus, older advisors don't seem to be making the effort to incorporate technology into their businesses, with only 13% over 40 adding tech to practices — a sharp contrast with 55% of those under 40 who are adding technology.
Almost 60% of those under 40 (vs. 23% of those over 40) believe tech adds a "superior experience" to client service. In addition, close to 93% of those under 40 believe technology provides "greater access" to financial products, such as alternatives, while 63% of those over 40 agree.
The good news is that none of the advisors surveyed believe robo-advisors will replace humans in the next five years. That said, 41% of those under 40 believe technology will change the role of the advisor away from portfolio management toward client acquisition and service. That compares with only 15% of advisors over 40 who believe that change will happen.
In addition, 63% of those under 40 view technology as supportive of holistic planning — including insurance, taxes, legal, real estate and other non-investment financial activities — whereas only 18% of those over 40 have this opinion.
Also, 47% of those under 40 (vs. 4% of those over 40) believe technology will provide quality interfaces that will drive client loyalty, and 45% think tech will "meaningfully lower the cost of investment management services" vs. just 11% of those over 40.
The survey concludes that "younger managers see game-changing possibilities in the benefits technology can bring to the practice of money management, creating opportunities to focus more of their energy on delivering the personalized service their clients demand, creating a service model that can help them thrive in a changing marketplace."
—Related on ThinkAdvisor:
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250