Cleary Launches New Feedback App for Associates
Launched earlier this month in Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton's New York office, ClearyLoop allows its associates to use an app to request informal feedback sessions with its senior lawyers.
December 27, 2018 at 03:25 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
As law firms work to develop new systems to coach and mentor their junior talent, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton has launched an app that puts its associates in the driver's seat and allows them to push for feedback when they want it.
ClearyLoop is a tech-based platform that allows associates to request an informal feedback session with senior lawyers from an app located on their desk site. The app, which was launched earlier this month in its New York office, then blocks out time for these sessions on the lawyers' respective calendars.
The idea for ClearyLoop, which will be launched on a wider scale across the firm in 2019, was actually first developed by a team of associates earlier this year as a part of a hackathon sponsored by the firm.
“[We wanted] to get groups of associates to think about solving a problem or something that we all wanted to see improvement on at the firm,” said litigation partner Carmine Boccuzzi Jr., who chairs the firm's associate committee.
“And we focused on the issue [of] how to improve the delivery of clear, actionable, real-time feedback from senior lawyers to associates at the firm.”
Beginning in March, six teams of associates and other lawyers worked to come up with ideas to improve feedback across populations at the firm. They then presented their ideas in a shark-tank style forum to the senior leadership at the firm who selected a winner with the promise that they would work to implement the winning idea.
After selecting ClearyLoop, the firm then worked to build the proposed platform alongside its human resources and IT departments.
While the goal was to create something that reflected the vision of the winning team, the firm also wanted to ensure that it reflected some of the practicalities and realities at the firm to increase the chances that it would be something that was going to be used by its attorneys, said Cleary bankruptcy and restructuring partner Jane VanLare, who led the subcommittee to develop ClearyLoop.
“Ultimately, our goal was to facilitate informal feedback and that's what was driving this whole process,” she said. “We all think that's something that's extremely important and embracing the 21st century with an app that made this easier.”
For junior lawyers, the context and medium through which they could request feedback was incredibly important, perhaps more important than some of its senior partners realized, VanLare said.
Associates have grown up using this kind of technology and have interacted with it in various aspects of their lives, so it was important for the firm to reflect the way associates found it easiest and most convenient to try and solicit feedback, she added.
Over the next year, Cleary will roll out ClearyLoop to its various offices, adapting it as it goes along. The firm will also track and gather data about how often its attorneys are using the app, with the hope that its use becomes second nature.
In a Big Law environment, it can be difficult to engage the whole firm on issues like feedback, said Francesca Odell, a member of Cleary's executive committee who spearheaded the Hackathon.
But through the development of ClearyLoop, the firm was able to experiment with new ideas and try different approaches while promoting communication and engagement across all populations at the Am Law firm, especially its youngest talent.
“Our hope is this begins a much broader dialogue about feedback, but also about how we can use tools like this to pull together areas of the firm where associates have views and want to be involved in how we manage things,” Odell said.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThese Law Firm Leaders Are Optimistic About 2025, Citing Deal Pipeline, International Business
6 minute read‘A Force of Nature’: Littler Mendelson Shareholder Michael Lotito Dies At 76
3 minute readRemembering Am Law 100 Firm Founder and 'Force of Nature' Stephen Cozen
5 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250