When Faced With High-Stakes Government Investigations, Lawyers Have a Road Map
A Legalweek 2019 session is set to discuss and provide an update to the Government Investigations Reference Model, a road map created by attorneys and former government officials, for managing an investigation for regulators and companies.
January 10, 2019 at 11:00 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legal Tech News
Government investigations of companies can be a high-stakes and hectic experience. Thankfully, experienced attorneys have assembled a "Government Investigations Reference Model" chart to provide a road map for managing an investigation for regulators and companies.
Jenner & Block partner David Greenwald is one of the original authors of the document, and he is set to moderate a Jan. 29 session at the Legaltech conference during Legalweek titled, "The Government Reference Model." The session seeks to provide attorneys with the government's and outside counsel's perspective of best practices for companies facing an investigation.
The session also includes Morgan, Lewis & Bockius partner Scott Milner, U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division e-discovery director Allison Stanton and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau special counsel for e-discovery Glenn Melcher.
For Greenwald, who co-wrote the document with former U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission senior special counsel Patrick Oot and Ashish Prasad, who is vice president and GC of technology consultant eTERA Consulting, a simple guide for government investigations was essential because the investigations are fast pace with high stakes.
"The idea was to create something like the EDRM model for e-discovery to provide a single document that would enable a discussion with anyone involved with an internal investigation, on the government side or corporate side," said Greenwald. He added that the report provides the "overall process to the parties so you could see the overall map of where you are starting and going and all the workstreams involved."
The report also allows the IT and review teams to understand the investigation's process and ensure cooperation with the government. "[It] empower[s] people with a way to make sure the technical data side is in communication with the team effectively and early, and not be siloed off," Greenwald explained.
Greenwald revealed he will also offer a slightly revised update of the "Government Investigations Reference Model," which first debuted at the 2017 Government Investigations and Civil Litigation Institute, at the Legalweek session.
Currently the chart provides a timeline starting with the emergence of a matter of interest for the government and a company's corresponding "internal discovery of [a] matter" and ends with the implementation of the government's final resolution.
To Milner, who co-leads Morgan Lewis' eData practice group, the Legalweek session also offers helpful insight from government lawyers Stanton and Melcher.
"I think anyone that interfaces or receives government requests, they have an opportunity to have two people from regulations that can give their perspective. I think that's invaluable," said Milner.
Greenwald shared those sentiments, adding the panel will allow a "balanced view from both sides" and allow others the "opportunity to hear from the government where it sees companies performing very well or coming short."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJD Vance Has a History With Biden's Judicial Nominee for Northern District of Illinois
4 minute readCongressional Probes Often Catch Companies Off Guard. Is Your Company Ready?
9 minute readWhite-Collar Enforcement Is Finally Here in the Biden Administration
'Don't Sell Patients Procedures They Do Not Need': Miami Attorneys Secure $1.1 M Verdict from Dental Practice
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250