The marquee of Hamilton, An American Musical, which is playing at the Richard Rogers Theater. Joseph M. Arseneau/Shutterstock.comHouston Lawyer Who Sued Over Wrong-Day 'Hamilton' Tickets Gets Settlement
Houston lawyer Joshua Davis, who sued Ticketmaster on Wednesday, said the company on Friday agreed to refund.
January 11, 2019 at 04:03 PM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Sometimes it pays to be a lawyer with the chops to sue over a customer service issue.
Two days after Houston lawyer Joshua Davis sued Ticketmaster—seeking damages after the ticket broker refused to refund $2,325.20 Davis spent on wrong-day tickets for “Hamilton”—Ticketmaster agreed to refund the lawyer's money.
Davis, of plaintiffs firm Davis Law Group in Houston, said he got a call from the Ticketmaster legal department on Friday, and the company offered to “fully refund” his money, and also cover what he spent to file the lawsuit in state district court in Houston on Wednesday.
“I'm whole, and I expect that we will buy tickets for the right day,” Davis said. “I've reached a complete settlement with Ticketmaster.”
Ticketmaster did not immediately respond to an email request for an interview.
Davis sued Ticketmaster shortly after he bought three tickets for the popular musical playing in New York. He noticed immediately the tickets were for the wrong day, but as he alleged in Davis v. Ticketmaster, Ticketmaster customer service initially said the company would not refund his money or switch his tickets to the correct day.
Intending to buy tickets on March 14 or 15 to celebrate his oldest daughter's 12th birthday on March 9, Davis alleged that he accidentally bought tickets for Jan. 17 after hitting the “back” button on his browser.
Davis said he was angry that the company's customer service department would not work with him, so he did what a lawyer can do, and sued.
Davis said he feels “Hamiltonian,” because his lawsuit was successful.
“A big part of [the musical] is [Alexander] Hamilton's disposition of having moments where he gets pissed off and writes something—and oftentimes is rewarded by it,” Davis said.
|Further Reading:
Houston Lawyer, Stuck With 'Hamilton' Tickets for Wrong Day, Sues Ticketmaster
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
More Big Law Firms Rush to Match Associate Bonuses, While Some Offer Potential for Even More
Morgan & Morgan Looks to Grow Into Complex Litigation While Still Keeping its Billboards Up
6 minute read
The Path in the Multiverse: Rethinking Client Engagement Through Gamification
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Will Trump Be a Boost to Quinn Emanuel's Fortunes in China?
- 2Legaltech Rundown: LexisNexis Releases Lexis+ AI Mobile App, Hotshot Launches New M&A Training Simulation, and More
- 3Perkins Coie Boasts Diverse Partner Class
- 4READ THE DOC: NY Judge Indefinitely Delays Sentencing in Trump Hush Money Case
- 5US Supreme Court Tries to Define a 'Crime of Violence'
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
