Boston Forecast Sees More Law Firm Mergers Ahead
A new survey by Zeughauser Group found nearly a third of Boston law firm leaders open to combining with another firm in the next three to five years.
January 15, 2019 at 02:58 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
The legal boom in Boston is far from over, a new survey by legal management consulting firm Zeughauser Group suggests.
Of nearly 40 managing partners and other senior leaders of Boston law firms ranging in size from 10 to 200 attorneys, 71 percent reported that they were approached to combine with another firm over the past year.
Thirty-one percent of firms said they would consider a combination with another firm within the next three to five years. And, of those firms interested in a combination, 55 percent said they would be interested in a combination with a larger firm.
And for firms that are looking to enter the market, this signals a clear opportunity. “There's no shortage of large firms that would like to acquire high-quality smaller firms in Boston,” said Kent Zimmermann, a consultant at Zeughauser Group.
“The reality is they're out there and you need to know where to look,” he said.
Law firm leaders in Boston are also feeling pressure from the increased competition for legal work and talent in the city. About 26 percent said they expect the level of competition from non-Boston-based law firms in the city to grow significantly, while 69 percent said they think it will grow somewhat.
As larger and more profitable firms expand into regional markets, either entering or growing there, it's changing the competitive landscape, Zimmermann said, likening Boston's boom to what has been seen in Dallas, Houston and Los Angeles.
Boston, which has become an investment magnet for the technology and life sciences industries, has a particular draw for law firms these days, he noted.
“Legal is a follow the money profession,” Zimmermann said.
Arent Fox, Kirkland & Ellis, Hogan Lovells, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, Womble Bond Dickinson and, most recently, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe and Freeman Mathis & Gary, are all recent entrants to the market, chasing both local clients and national legal talent based in the city.
And for Boston-based firms, that has made growing organically much more difficult.
“The decision is being made at many firms to put all options on the table to achieve their aspirations,” Zimmermann said, which includes a combination with another firm.
The survey also found that Boston-based law firms are prioritizing growth in their litigation sectors. Forty-nine percent of law firms said they would like to add to their litigation teams in the next three to five years.
Labor and employment followed as a close second, with 43 percent of firms prioritizing the area for growth.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThese Law Firm Leaders Are Optimistic About 2025, Citing Deal Pipeline, International Business
6 minute read‘A Force of Nature’: Littler Mendelson Shareholder Michael Lotito Dies At 76
3 minute readRemembering Am Law 100 Firm Founder and 'Force of Nature' Stephen Cozen
5 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 2Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 3'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 4Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
- 5As a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250