Walgreens Agrees to Pay $269 Million in Public Plan Fraud Settlements
The cases involve allegations about insulin pens and drug price disclosure problems.
January 23, 2019 at 10:47 AM
4 minute read
Health InsuranceThe original version of this story was published on Law.com
Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. agreed to pay $269.2 million to settle U.S. claims that the drugstore chain defrauded a federally-funded health care program over insulin drugs and a consumer-discount initiative.
The two settlements, announced Tuesday, cover allegations over improper billing. In the first one, the company agreed to pay $209.2 million to resolve claims it billed Medicare, Medicaid and other programs for hundreds of thousands of insulin pens it distributed to people who didn't need them. In the second, Walgreens said it would pay $60 million for overbilling Medicaid by not disclosing lower drug prices it offered in a discount program.
The accords come as scrutiny of health care costs increases across the country. The Trump administration has been focused on trying to drive down prescription-drug costs, and lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have introduced bills aimed at capping pharmaceutical prices. States including California have also floated plans to try to rein in spending on prescription drugs.
Walgreens is also confronting an increasingly competitive retail and pharmacy landscape after rival CVS Health Corp. agreed to acquire health insurer Aetna Inc. and Amazon.com Inc. bought online pharmacy PillPack.
"Overbilling and improper billing of Medicare and Medicaid unduly burden taxpayers and put the solvency of these vital health care programs at risk," U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman in Manhattan said in a statement. The company "admitted and accepted responsibility for the conduct the government alleged in its complaints under the False Claims Act."
'Best Interests'
Walgreens said in a statement that it is pleased to have resolved the suits, cooperated with the government and "admitted no wrongdoing." The company declined to elaborate on whether it "accepted responsibility" for the allegations in the U.S. complaint, as prosecutors said.
"We are resolving these matters because we believe it is in the best interest of our customers, patients and other stakeholders to move forward," the company said in a statement.
The settlement has been fully accounted for in Walgreens' financial statement as of Nov. 30, the company said, adding that it entered into a corporate integrity agreement with the U.S. Health and Human Services Department that builds on its existing compliance program.
Walgreens configured its systems so that pharmacists couldn't dispense less than a full box of five insulin pens, and then it submitted false data in reimbursement claims indicating that the total number of daily doses didn't go over program limits, prosecutors said. As a result, Walgreens received millions of dollars for insulin that many people didn't need while wasting "substantial quantities" of the medication, the U.S. said.
The other settlement involves a program called the Prescription Savings Club that gave discounts to customers who ordered drugs from Walgreens. Prosecutors said the company failed to disclose the lower prices when seeking reimbursement from Medicaid.
Both cases arose from lawsuits filed years ago by whistle-blowers under the False Claims Act. They were both unsealed on Tuesday. Walgreens' payments will go to federal and state governments.
The U.S. didn't say how much the whistle-blowers stand to collect.
The cases are U.S. v Walgreens Inc., 12-cv-300, and U.S. v Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc., 15-cv-5686, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).
—With assistance from Timothy Annett.
— Read Drug Prices Drive Many Americans to Black Market for Medicines, on ThinkAdvisor.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250